Slow Day Today

I hope we don't sign pitts. The last thing we need is another injury prone player in Seattle. Can't wait for the draft!
I think we will work something out for marshal and trade down to pick up a couple extra draft picks!
Maybe a pick next year to help get locker
Go hawks!

Dont know anything about him. Think it would be a straight up swap: Smiley for Sims?

I know nothing about Smiley other than that he is 28 years old and was a 2nd rounder. He would be an immediate starter and you couldn't get that out of the fourth rounder you would get for him otherwise. I wouldn't be mad with this trade if it happened, but time will tell.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justin_Smiley

i wouldn't mess with him, haha

Justin Smiley is pretty much the spitting image of an Alex Gibbs guard. He'd be a great addition to the line.

Smiley is great--when healthy. Problem is, he's missed 5 games and 8 starts the last two years. Plus he has a fat contract. And so the Tuna is giving up on him.

IF he can stay healthy, he's what we need: a young-ish veteran with attitude to spare. He will play well alongside whichever LT we draft this year--and we'd better draft one at 14!

I am hoping for Gibbs magic and McCoy at 6 and Spiller/Thomas/Best/Mathews at 14, with a trade that lands Marshall in Seattle without spending a draft pick (Spencer/Sims).

14 seems way way way to high for fringe first rounders like Best and Mathews. We are best getting Hardesty later in the draft, possibly at 60.

All the top LTs seem to have questions about their future in the NFL. There is not one clear franchise LT in the bunch, including Okung, based on the various scouting reports.

Davis is a bust waiting to happen
Williams seems more of a RT then franchise LT
Bulaga seems the most NFL-ready, but may be at his max
Campbell is all athleticism, ala Jason Smith, and unproven at the position
Charles Brown probably suits Gibbs the best, but is not a dominate LT

So it is hard to get excited about drafting one of these guys with the top two picks. Perhaps position value makes it inevitable, but with talent like Spiller, Best, Mathews and Thomas likely on the board (probably 2 of the 3, if not all 3) and maybe Haden, it just seems like a better long-term value pick than a good (not great) offensive tackle.

sometimes: should be "3 out of 4, if not all 4"

There are a number of mid-round options at RB: Hardesty, Blount, Gerhart, Tate, and they all lack one thing that makes them mid-rounders versus Spiller, Best or Mathews: speed.

Plus, Spiller and Best are accomplished receivers (Mathews now so much).

Seattle needs skilled players: QB, WR, RB, DB, safety. Cover skills. Speed. Big play capability.

I don't see that later in the draft. Hardesty will get you 4 or 5 yards, maybe 8 (same with Forsett). Spiller/Best/Mathews will take it 30, 40 or more on a regular basis.

You could build a very good traditional running game around Mathews. Spiller and Best add another dimension coming out of the backfield and lining up in the slot. These are things that no one in the later rounds (unless you want to try McCluster or Ford (the fastest guy at the combine) but I think for Seattle taking one of these guys at 14 would be exciting.

On defense, speed and cover skills are at a premium, and I see 3 top players with both: Berry, Haden and Thomas. If Seattle takes McCoy at 6, that likely eliminates Berry and Haden from consideration. If McCoy isn't there, then for me it would be Berry/Haden (Haden if Berry is also gone).

At 14, that means Haden (unlikely) and Thomas (more likely). A McCoy/Thomas first round would be awesome for the defense.

there are some great defensive players avaiable at the top of the draft, but the hawks are in desperate need of restocking the offense, and their defense has some good talent already. Ruskell left the offense in ruins. Unless Mccoy or Suh drops, my opinion is that both of the first round picks should be used on offensive players.

If Clausen, Okung, Suh, McCoy and Bradford are gone by six, what offensive player do you take over Berry or Haden?

Not trying to start an argument, just curious who you see worth taking over these two talented players.

At 14, I see all the options on offense, whether o-line or RB, with Thomas the lone exception. If Berry or Haden get taken at 6, then the best option seems LT/RB at 14 (at least in my opinion).

...at the top of the draft seems critical, given the few times a team hopes to be there. Whether its taking an elite LT or QB, WR or RB, CB or safety, DE or DT, that seems to be how to build a good team.

Finding the jewels later in the draft (Mebane, for example) is great, but not something that can be counted on.

Settling on a 'good' player over a 'great' one seems like a mistake to me.

I'd be seriously dissapointed if that's how the Hawks draft ended after 2 rounds.

I do agree it is good to take top tier talent when it is there, but if it plays out like what you said, my honest preference would just be to trade down. That is obviously a cop out, but with all the other needs we have, I dont want to see us get a safety at 6. It just seems silly to me because it is safety. And I don't know, haden would be ok i guess, but I think we are ok with Trufant and Wilson at CB for now.

So if couldn't trade down, if the draft was like that, I would probably want Bulaga. I would also be ok with Dez Bryant, based only on talent, not all his baggage. To be honest, i would even be ok with a trade for Marshall at that point. Baggage for sure, but proven NFL production. I might even be ok with spiller, but i will agree that berry would clearly be the BPA. I dont know, i hope the draft doesn't go how you suggested

Hardesty ran his 40 time faster than Mathews did, so its not like he is slow at all. Straight line speed may be the most overated trait in a RB anyway.

There is no way guys like Best and Mathews are worth it in the top 20. Mathews has nice measurables, but watching tape he is not impressive at all. His OL also dominated against weak defenses. Personally I think Mathews is the most overhyped player coming out. He is nothing special IMO.

Best is not a good option IMO because he is not as good of a pass catcher as others, can't block, has a slight injury history and is the same back as Forsett but faster. Why upgrade a guy with a 5 yard APC with a first round unknown with a lesser skill set?

Hardesty at 60 is the best bet. He is also supposed to be the best fit for the ZBS.

Hawksince77,

I'm noticing some places where Hardesty is listed as faster than Mathews, but elsewhere where Mathews is listed as the faster. Regardless both ran in the 4.4 range so its not a noticable difference regardless of who is faster.

...I didn't remember him being that fast and didn't bother to look it up.

Hawksince77--The offensive player that should be considered at 6 is Dez Bryant--he's the best offensive player in this draft, and the most likely to achieve consistent NFL success (NOT Spiller). He's young and lacks the solid character one would like to have, but what WR these days with talent like his HAS character?! Andre Johnson is the only one, and he's not available at any price.

I would advocate taking him even if we land Marshall. No one knows IF Butler will ever become a starter, and he lacks the necessary size. He's destined to play slot. Housh is a posession WR and likely gone after this year. After that we have nothing but garbage.

I would be happy with McCoy or Berry though too. I still think we need a solid LT, and since we traded down to 60 from 40, we wont be finding out starting LT at 60. In fact, we might not be finding a starter at ANY position at 60--maybe a solid RB to complement Forsett or a FS like Myron Rolle.

I really like Earl Thomas, but he's shot up draft boards and may not even be there at 14. I also like Demaryius Thomas, who isnt as quick as Bryant but fast enough and has great size, but he's gonna go in the first round/early second. If we want him, its gotta be at 14 or trade down. He wont be there at 60 either.

And I also really like Golden Tate. Im sad we traded out of the 40th slot, as I really thought we might go S, LT, and take him at 40. Thing is, Tate plays above his size and could go in the first round easily.

I think theres at least 5-6 LT's that have a good chance of being quality starters, and so would be happy with any of them at 14. Spiller is intriguing, but we really dont need another undersized speedster. Forsett is a stud, and is quicker onfield than folks give him credit for being. We need a fourth round brusier to help him out, not a faster wimpier Forsett.

Im not excited about Derek Morgan at all. Nor JPP. Too much risk for such a high pick, without enough upside.

Cant wait for the Draft!

Tate also ran faster than matthews, just sayin, he was the third fastest running back and he weighs 220 pounds

I do like Bryant, he is the real deal and I personally think the character concerns are grossly exagerated much like Jimmy Clausen. He is a much better prospect than Crabcake was last year, and I think we would have pulled the trigger on him last year had Curry not fallen past Kansas City.

Spiller is the real deal IMO. He does everything, and does it well. He is a lot tougher than his weight suggests and fights much like Forsett for every single yard. Watch his film STTBM, the dude breaks tackles left and right. You wouldn't be calling him wimpy if you've seen him play as often as I have. I don't think we take him unless we grab LT at 6 and he somehow falls to 14.

The more I think on it the more I like taking Berry at 6 if Okung (will be), or Bulaga are gone. I currently live on the East Coast and watch every single Ravens game, so if Berry even lives up to half his hype as being the next Ed Reed we got a true game changer here. We can grab Charlie Brown at 14, so its not like we're passing up on our LT of the future either.

I'm close in opinion to where you are Omar Little. I would be dissapointed if the Hawks take Spiller at 6, not because I think he's a bad player but because I think that's too high to take him given other needs. if they didn't have other holes then by all mean! I balk a bit at safety at 6, but I think Berry is a special player and one of those holes. I'd prefer one of the stud LT's or DT's if they fell, but Berry if they didn't. With the 14 I wouldn't scream if they took Spiller as the value is better, although I'd really look to O line if we took S at 6, and maybe even if we didn't. Taking Lupati and the best LT available at 6 would be a solid first round in my view...even better if they can trade down on one or both of those first picks and get more in the 2nd/3rd range. As for RB, I think Tate would be a perfect fit. As for WR, Marshall has a world of talent and if the price is right worth the risk, but draft wise there are a number of decent WR's that will be available 3rd round and lower I believe...hence the desire to trade down to pick up more picks. Too many holes to fill with the current number of picks.

Oh, and I have a sleeper I'd like to see PC pull the trigger on...RB Stafon Johnson. I think he comes back from that throat injury and in doing so proves he's a fighter with real heart...love those types, particularly if they have skills.

...for a slow day.

STTBM,

Bryant may turn out to have a good NFL career, but he doesn't seem to have treated this off-season very professionally, and that concerns me. I think measurables are generally overrated, and on the field performance and character generally underrated. And while Bryant certainly has the on-field credentials, his character concerns me.

Also, I am assuming (hoping) that the Marshall deal gets done without costing any draft picks. While I wouldn't choose to trade Sims and Spencer, it seems like they are on the way out, and that being the case, I would just as soon see Marshall enter before the door swings shut on those two big guys.

If that happens, I don't see value in spending a high draft pick on a WR. Finally, I think Bryant may drop to 14, making a selection at 6 completely unnecessary, even if they wanted him.

I completely agree about the DEs (Morgan, et al) and hope they don't get drafted by Seattle at all.

Omar, Best Alive;

So it's Spiller of bust in the first round for Seattle. I can go with that. Mathews and Best will also be drafted in the first, but probably in the 20s or lower, so if that's the case, both would be a big reach at 14.

The only other offensive player that might be worth taking at 6 is Clausen.

This is a change for me, but I have read some convincing arguments in his favor. If he really has the potential to be a franchise QB, and if he is there at 6, I would advocate drafting him.

Hasselbeck is past his prime (obviously); Teel a question mark; and Whitehurst, while I applaud the move to aquire him, is likely a mediocre starter in the NFL, at best. If that's true, he fills an important role: the back up QB. Or the bridge to a new franchise guy. That guy might be Clausen.

Highlander,

Taking the best available LT at 6 may mean taking the second or third one drafted. Given that none of the OTs by some accounts are worthy of a top-ten grade, taking the second or third best in a mediocre (more broad that deep with elite talent) would be a waste.

Iupati (note the spelling - starts with an 'I' as in 'eye' not L) at 14 might be worth it if he fit Gibbs type player, which I have heard he doesn't. There are several guards in the draft that scouts have called out as fitting a zone blocking system, and it's likely those guys will be targeted, not Iupati.

I completely agree on Stafon Johnson - I would be surprised if PC DIDN'T spend a late round pick on him - maybe as high as a fifth, but more likely the sixth, given his unique insight into Johnson's potential. For competition at the position, if nothing else.

Taking the best available LT at 6 may mean taking the second or third one drafted. Given that none of the OTs by some accounts are worthy of a top-ten grade, taking the second or third best in a mediocre (more broad that deep with elite talent) would be a waste.

I agree with you to an extent. If 2 OT's have been taken before 6 and 2 QB's have been taken (presumably, who knows) then that means one of the top 2 DT's are available. If worse came to worse I sure wouldn't complain about Berry at 6. But I've seen various mocks and blogs that suggest various combinations of Okung, Bulaga, Campbell and Williams all as very high pick OT's. I suspect that Campbell isn't the best fit and maybe the others aren't either.

Iupati (note the spelling - starts with an 'I' as in 'eye' not L) at 14 might be worth it if he fit Gibbs type player, which I have heard he doesn't. There are several guards in the draft that scouts have called out as fitting a zone blocking system, and it's likely those guys will be targeted, not Iupati.

Ah, I have it on good authority that he's going to change the spelling because it causes me difficulties

I certainly would defer to the Hawk staff on judging which linemen fit the ZB system best. But if we take Berry at 6 I'd hope for a O lineman here, although other possiblities might be RB Spiller or CB Haden, maybe OT Brown or OG Iupati. Truth be told, I'd look to trade down this pick and try to get a 2nd or 3rd depending on how far down we'd move.

I completely agree on Stafon Johnson - I would be surprised if PC DIDN'T spend a late round pick on him - maybe as high as a fifth, but more likely the sixth, given his unique insight into Johnson's potential. For competition at the position, if nothing else.

Precicesly. I think he's excellent value in 5 or 6th round. From what I've read his injury shouldn't pose a problem for the future.

I wouldn't say Spiller or bust, in fact I feel that we would be better off getting a power back like Hardesty or Blountt in the later rounds to compliment Forsett.

There is no doubt that Spiller would improve our running game dramatically, but we probably have bigger needs that offer more value than another scat back on our roster. I also feel that with the short lives of RBs, you should only take a high shot on one after you have other pieces (LT, QB) in place to maximize your chances at a SB.

Any combo of Berry, Haden, McCoy, Clausen, Bulaga, Campbell, Spiller, Dan Williams (would be enticing if available at 14) or Bryant will be fine with me however.

Guys I am weary of are Trent Williams, Anthony Davis, JPP, Derrick Morgan (like him, just not top 20 like him), Everson Griffen, Carlos Dunlap, Taylor Mays, Mike Iupati and Sam Bradford. I hope I don't see us draft any of these guys come draft day.

Oh, and Charlie Brown. I do like him a lot.

What I meant by "It's Spiller in the first for Seattle or bust," I was thinking specifically of picks 6 and 14. In other words, you (among others) have argued persuasively that Best or Mathews were not viable picks at 14 (and obviously not at 6) so if Seattle wants to draft an RB, and Spiller isn't selected, than someone like Hardesty, Tate, Blount, etc. might be selected in later rounds.

I would be shocked if Seattle didn't select at least one RB, and wouldn't be surprised if they took two.

"Also, I am assuming (hoping) that the Marshall deal gets done without costing any draft picks."

umm...how? that does not seem possible

What's with all the shoe stuff?

If we dont sign Marshall, I for one will be extremely disappointed. Playmaker. The rest of the draft, I cant wait to see what we do, but its always been my perception, right or wrong, that our best players were always late draft picks, underestimated guys that no one foresaw as bieng good.

I think Derrick Morgan would be the absolute worst mistake EVER! I would rather have Brandon Graham or Tyson Alualu. Morgan is a late first round talent in any other DE class.

These are the players I think Carroll is targeting.

1. Okung, Trent Williams (Trade down)
14. Spiller, Mays
60. Brandon Marshall or Tyson Alualu (add 4th for marshall)
4th Lagarrette Blount or other powerback

Really this the only way it will pan out.

6 Okung or Berry. Neither 2 DT's will be there. Long shot would be Jimmy C.

14 If LT is not taked at 6 then its best Lt available. Possibly Spiller.
Charles Brown, CJ Spiller, Dez Briant, Mike Lupati.
Dez Briant will not be a option if we Trade pic 60 plus a 4th for B Marshall.

6 Okung
14 Earl Thomas
60 Traded to Den B Marshall
4th Round-7 Round
RB,OL,DL,

About the Marshall trade, Spencer and Sims have been mentioned as part of a trade. Given Denver's needs and scheme on the o-line, I am hoping that is enough to bring Marshall to Seattle without using one of the top three picks.

Perhaps just hopeless optimism, but optimism based on specific speculation within the industry - I didn't make it up.

The Hawks have so many glaring needs that it's hard to let go of any of this year's picks. I wonder if Denver might go for something like Spencer, Sims and next year's 2nd round pick.

That still seems like a lot to give up. Right now we have the buyers market in hand. I think Sims or Spencer and a 4th(next years?) should do it.

Well, if a better deal can be negotiated I'm all for that. My main point was, if you're going to give up a draft pick, how about make it from next year.

Hawksince77--Dez Bryant's character flaws are not that big of a deal. Its obvious that once again teams that covet him late in the first round are spreading BS hoping he falls. He's almost as big as Crabtree, and a lot faster. And he's also very young.

Plus, Brandon Marshall is a far worse character risk with many more troubling issues than Bryant. Bryant supposedly was regularly late for meetings, though his coaching staff denies this, and he lost a year of eligibility because the NCAA Nazis scared him into lying about hanging out with Deion Sanders. While Im sure Deion was up to something, Bryant most likely wasnt. Marshall on the other hand, has been VIDEO TAPED hitting and kicking his girlfriend, and has TWO domeestic abuse accusations with two different women; on top of that, he has been found guilty of DUI, and his jerky behavior led to Darrent Williams murder. An awful lot of baggage and a serious character risk.

I dont understand the logic that says Marshall isnt a huge risk, nor do I understand how Bryant's character flaws can even be considered as in the same universe as Marshalls.

I also dont think getting Marshall should preclude taking Bryant. We have no young WR's with size, so landing two immediately would be huge. And a talent like Bryant doesnt come along every year--you nab them when you can.

As I said, I will be happy with any combo of McCoy/Suh, Berry, Bryant. But Bryant truly deserves to be targeted in the top 10, and if we pass on him I dont think Holmgren will pass on him. He wont make it out of the top 10.

Think how high Crabtree went despite his Prima Donna Diva routine pre-draft. Bryant may not be perfect, but he isnt in that class of idiot!

Looks like the Skins are in the race for Marshal, could be bad news.

I get your point Highlander.
STTBM you bring up a valid point, I didn't think Dez woulg go top ten but in comparison to crabass, i think you changed my mind. There'll be some big suprises come draft day.

Would be nice if you linked to a source.

Checked NFL.com, Redskins web page, rotoworld, ESPN, and nothing about them being in the race for Marshall.

Back up your source TX! Where did you see they are in the race for Marshall? Link it up brotha!

Rad it on ESPN, it is rumor but still seems viable.

http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors

Read* Guess I forgot how to spell.

I see Marshall and Bryant as two seperate issues,, the only relationship having to do with how much the team invests in one position.

I think Marshall a huge risk, and wouldn't give up any of Seattle's top three picks for him, but if he can be had for a trade that involves two o-linemen that you have ripped consistently over the past couple of years, then I think it worth considering.

Bryant, on the other hand, unproven in the NFL, will cost one of those precious picks, and if you are correct, the 6th overall in the draft. Now if PT is able to come to terms with whatever issues that have been reported about Bryant, then I am down with that. It's just that any player - even the supposedly safe ones like Berry and McCoy - carry some risk in translating their game and their character from college to the pros, so any hint of character issues, ala Bryant and Davis, for example, simply magnifies the risk inherent in drafting someone that high.

I think a play-making RB with top speed and the ability to catch the ball out of the backfield (Spiller, Best, perhaps McCluster) offer more offensive value than Bryant, or any WR in the draft. Throw in the possibility of adding Marshall to the roster, a move that will entail fielding a solid WR lineup with Housh, Butler and Carlson, and suddenly the offense has some teeth.

Who the heck would pay for insiders rumors?

Insiders has to be the biggest joke on ESPN's site.

Right on, thank you. I sure would be surprised if Shanahan (sp?) would take a chance on Marshall again. I believe Marshall got under his skin while they both were in Denver. But who knows, right?

I don't pay for rumors comes free with my magazine. Not saying they are right just that it is viable, Just like every other site out there they hit some and miss some. You are a bit serious aren't you? just bringing it up for conversation sake.

I'm serious about insider charging people for information just because they feel it's somehow "special, exclusive" information only for them. Sports stories, information and especially rumors shouldn't be paid for by anyone, that's all I'm sayin'.

Again I don't pay for rumors! I get it with the espn the mag subscription that was given to me as a gift by a friend late last year.

But I agree that it should be free and when my subscription runs out I will not resubscribe. to be perfectly honest the mag is not all that good either

Here is another link that isnt a insider.
I bet the redskins will get marshall or owens.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/26/shanahan-doesnt-rule-out-big-name-receivers/

http://voices.washingtonpost.c...rrell.html

There is another

Given the choice between Marshall and Bryant, I'd take Marshall any day. He is proven himself to be one of the most talented recievers in the game today. He is up there with the two Johnsons in terms of talent and production.

To me Bryant is good, but STTBM is making him seem like a once in a decade type of talent. He is not. He is the top reciever in this draft class as of now, and will likely be first off the board unless someone pulls an Al Davis but he doesn't seem to be the same type of player as true top 10 reciever talent. I don't think anyone will ever get Dez Bryant confused with a Calvin Johnson or Brandon Marshall.

Well, according to the articles, Washington is not willing to part with their 1st round pick for Marshall either, so I guess it will come down to a sign and trade, and which ever team offers the best trade will get Marshall.

Maybe this will ligt a fire under the FO's a$$. I would like to see Marshall in Seahawk blue and green.

It would be great to have Marshall but I still hate our quarterback situation consisting of a "has-been" and 2 "never-was" players. I hope Clausen is available at #6 to get Pete Carroll's attention.

Don't forget that Marshall doesn't have to sign a long-term contract with what ever team Denver wants to deal with and no team is going to trade for one year of Marshall. The Beast is going to have a lot to do with whatever negotiations are going on, and whichever team gets him is ultimately going to have to convince both the Broncos and Marshall to sign off on any deal.

why's that Hawksfan80? looking for a 3rd "never-was"?

Ken lucas is visiting the tennesse titans

http://12thmanrising.com/2010/03/25/seattle-seahawks-cornerback-ken-lucas-visiting-tennessee-titans/

I just dont see this happening. I think that marshall will be asking for a pretty big contract extension, and do the skins really have the cap to give it to him? Logic would say no, I guess I dont know how much cap room the skins have and sure you can cut contracts without cap penilties this year, but I dont think it will happen just for that reason alone. I can see them talking about it just to drive the price down on T.O.

I guess we will never know...

Read this article and then check out the last statement.
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/ru...nfl,230357

Here is some more marshall news.

http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2010/03/26/marshall-releases-bizarre-statement/

Time for a new thread.

I agree MontanaMike. I'll give you a topic...jumbo shrimp...are they jumbo or shrimpy...talk amongst yourselves.

Oh, or for a football topic, how about sleeper picks...like round 6/7/undrafted types.

LT Jason Fox hurt his hamstring in his pro-day. I wouldn't mind taking him with a 6th or 7th round pick if he is available. He's a 2nd round value with a little bad luck lately. Definitely worth the risk.

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-...mock-draft

He has Bradford, Okung, MCCOY, Williams, Bulaga 1-5, leaving...Suh! to number 6 and the Seahawks.

Whoa....that would be awesome!

Drafting Suh would be great. And it is finitely possible.
Unfortunately I don't put a great deal of faith in Brooks' predictions, let alone mock drafts.
It would be great though.

...fall to 6, and I am not so sure Suh is the best option. He's had some knee surgury, and I think he's a few years older than McCoy, but I'd be stoked if either of them was available.

In Brooks mock, Suh, Berry and Clausen would be there at 6, so another option might be a trade.

I know we have to draft an LT, but if Suh just happen to fall to us could you imagine taking Mays at 14. We would have a potential All-pro at every level of our defense. It would be amazing! Suh-Curry-Mays. How would you like to face that as an offense for the next 5-10 years? Death to Leinart, Death to Smith, Death to Bradford! and wheel chairs to Fitzgerald, Crabtree, and Steven Jackson! hahahahaha

Sounds great. I don't think Carroll will try to neuter Curry or anyone else like Mora tried.

I would love a young, mean, talented defense. Not sure Mays is the answer, but he qualifies as mean.

We must address the OL weaknesses somehow, or the young defense will be on the field all the time and get old and tired real quick.

Not sure if anyone has posted this yet (too lazy to check) but there's rumors on PFT of a straight up trade of Rob Sims for Bears DE Alex Brown.

Link: http://profootballtalk.nbcspor...de-places/

Alex Brown: http://www.nfl.com/players/ale...=BRO246330

BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (AP) — Authorities say NFL linebacker Joey Porter has been arrested in Bakersfield on suspicion of drunken driving and accused of assaulting an officer and resisting arrest.
The California Highway Patrol says the 33-year-old player was confronted by officers early Saturday in a fast-food parking lot.

Porter refused to provide his driver's license and began to roll up his window when asked to leave the car. Police say that when an officer reached to unlock the door Porter slapped the officer's hand.

Porter eventually got out and complied with orders, placing his hands behind his back. He and a passenger were arrested.

The 11-year veteran recently signed with the Arizona Cardinals. He also has played for Pittsburgh and Miami.

dfdsfdhgdhgkfghfdg

thank you for your free information

Welcome to http://www.monclerwomens.com , Official online Wholesaler and Retailer of moncler coats the leading brand-moncler coats. We are Official Online Retailers of Moncler Jacket, we are glad that you spend your time to browse our selection of authentic moncler coats commodity, and also you can read our news, reviews and blogs. These boots are a must have among celebrities such as Kate Moss. We hope that you can write your reviews about our products on our site and find our collection of moncler coats news and information articles.