logo

All week, we’ll be giving a scouting preview of a different running back who are coming out in the upcoming NFL Draft who may or may not fit the zone blocking system. Today, we’ll talk about a guy who may very well be available at the top of the 2nd Round: Jonathan Dwyer

Who is he?

Jonathan Dwyer, from ColinAke.com

Dwyer is coming out after his Junior season at Georgia Tech; in the last three years, he’s averaged 6.2 yards per carry over 40 games; in his last two years, both as the primary back, he’s averaged 13 touchdowns / season and has had exactly 1,395 yards in both years. From what I’ve seen of him, he lacks lightning acceleration, but once he gets going, he is often gone. He’s the closest thing to a #1 RB in this draft, and has great size at 6’0”, 235 lbs.

How does he fit the scheme?

Dwyer is a tough one to read; on some hands, he looks like a perfect fit:  he excels between the tackles, blocks well, has good burst through a hole, and is very decisive. Most importantly: in 3 years, he has never once fumbled the ball, a huge plus for Carroll.

Dwyer has a lot of upside, but it’s hard to read his full skill set coming out of Georgia Tech, which uses a triple-option offense. A lot of the accounts I’ve read indicate that he looks out of shape, a little overweight; he doesn’t run with the punishing style someone of his size should. He has a very funny running style, which isn’t a knock necessarily, just a statement: he looks like he’s moving very slowly, when in fact his insanely long strides are putting him way in front of defenders. That said, he needs to get to open field before he gets in stride, and that just didn’t happen often in college.

Summary

Dwyer is an attractive pick, and his 2nd Round draft stock will be cemented if he weighs in around 220-230 at the Combine, but he is a bit of a risk. I still don’t see the Hawks going with a Running Back quite this early unless they truly believe Dwyer could be an every down back. On paper, he looks like a great pair to Justin Forsett, but as with Spiller, Dwyer doesn’t quite offer what you would think he does. That’s not necessarily a bad thing – both he and Spiller offer some nice surprises, too – but there are more essential holes to fill in the first two rounds, in my opinion.

Comments (25)Add Comment
...
written by Riggle, February 16, 2010
Thanks Chris. I enjoy learning about these incoming players.
...
written by Rob Staton, February 16, 2010
Dwyer concerns me a lot. He added bad weight last off season and it showed in his performance. GT tried to turn into a bit of a bruiser but it never really happened - despite his size I'd never consider Dwyer a 'power back'. He's one paced - I don't see much burst or an ability to make anyone miss. His pass protection wasn't really tested in the triple option, but I watched the ACC Championship game again last night and 4 of 5 times he didn't do enough to keep the QB clean. There's no evidence he can be an effective pass catcher.

Personally, I wouldn't touch him until rounds 3-4 because there's nothing outstanding to his game. You can find backs like him in any draft.
Not sold on Dwyer
written by Billy Showbiz, February 16, 2010
I looked at him a bit too and he just does not seem as explosive as some of the other available backs. You have to be concerned about a guy who is 235 but doesn't initiate contact. He is certainly not bad but just like this says, it seems as if the triple option offense helps him get into stride which gives him the ability to beat people. His line looked pretty tough at run blocking too. I hope we pass on this guy.
...
written by halkboy15, February 16, 2010
Matt Moore trade?????


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enHecU1i-y8
...
written by S.TTBM, February 16, 2010
Chris, your comment on Dwyer's long-stride running style reminded me of another great Hawk RB who also was a long-strider: Chris Warren. For years Warren was almost the only fun player to watch on offense for us (Too bad he's a dead beat Dad).

Warren never looked like he was moving fast, but he was! Unlike Dwyer, Warren never shied away from contact--perhaps thats why he burned out in six years or so. That and 300 carries a season will wear anyone out.

My personal preference would be to take Dez Bryant if we take an offensive playmaker--I'd much rather have him than Berry (other coverage safeties with talent like Thomas can be had later) or Spiller.

If the Hawks really want a compelment back to Forsett with some size, it makes no sense to draft Dwyer with his question marks in the second round, when they can get McKnight or Blount or Matthews much later in the draft. And guranteed, if they are looking BPA, there will be lineman and safeties and maybe even a WR or two (Golden Tate?!) likely available at pick 40.

I'd be surprised if they picked Dwyer at 40. Not enough reward for the risk.
Disagree
written by FWBrodie, February 16, 2010
I have to disagree with Rob on Dwyer. I've watched a ton of Georgia Tech games over the past couple years and Dwyer has demonstrated an ability to catch the ball and definitely possesses the burst to run by people. I'd call his pass pro a work in progress. There was usually effort just not usually very well thought out, which tells me he could be coached up in that area. Definitely has the size and strength the Seahawks very obviously lack. I don't think this combination of size and speed can be found "in any draft" as Rob stated. It can be very frustrating trying to learn anything about Dwyer watching him in that offense I know, but I really think you're holding that against him way too much.
...
written by mrcysco, February 16, 2010
RE: Matt Moore, not gonna happen. would take a 1st and 3rd round pick in compensation if the hawks signed him via free agency. It would likely take a similar package via trade. You gotta really believe in a player to give up that much for him.

...
written by omar little, February 16, 2010
I'm not really crazy about Dwyer either. On paper he is the next Steven Jackson (6ft, 235 lbs, 4.4 speed) but I just don't think he'll ever be a star in the NFL.

I do think he played in a ZBS cut and run system at GT, so that alone will make Carroll look long and hard (thats what she said) at him. Personally I don't think he'll fall past San Diego in the first, they need a bigger guy who can carry the load and can afford the risk.

I'd rather sit through another year of Forsett and Jones than take a guy like Dwyer. Not sure how next years class is going to look, but Mark Ingram will probably declare so I'd much rather wait on a chance to draft him.

Of course maybe we can find our guy in the later rounds.
...
written by Jay from NJ, February 16, 2010
Great write up, Chris. I personally think unless they are getting a dynamic playmaker (like Spiller), wait until later in the draft. There are too many holes in the team to waste a pick on a player that's not marginally better than what we already have.
"Marginally"
written by FWBrodie, February 16, 2010
I can't tell if you don't understand the word "marginally" or if you're trying to say Dwyer is somehow less than marginally better than Julius Jones which would imply that Dwyer is not better than Julius Jones at all.

Either way, I don't understand how Dwyer wouldn't be a significant upgrade to the roster. Even if you don't consider him an obvious choice to receive the bulk of the carries you cannot deny the complimentary qualities he would provide next to Justin Forsett. I mean the two largest areas of weakness in Forsett's game, game-breaking speed and short-yardage power, are Dwyer's strengths. Julius Jones is marginally stronger than Forsett in those areas at best.
...
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
omar little: I'd rather sit through another year of Forsett and Jones than take a guy like Dwyer.

That's crazy talk! Sorry, had to say that. Like many, I am not enthusiastic about Dwyer either. I don't want another year of Jones, however. I've written before that I think this is a weak class for RBs (QB's too), but I would like the Hawks to grab one somewhere in the mid rounds...or maybe trade for someone's backup, although I haven't studied to see if there was anyone that'd be attractive.
He's who I want
written by TheRealist, February 16, 2010
Dwyer seemed poised to really explode this year, but he didnt quite live up to that level. That being said, he is the prototypical work horse back, and I think he will have a nice NFL career. I see him as the most likely RB in this draft to have a consistently good, if not amazing career. That may sound like a Ruskell state of mind, but in this case, I think he really makes sense in the second round if he falls to us (which I very strongly doubt will happen anyway)

But given the size and the production, I am a big fan. He can at least be Shonn Green, dont you think? (i know the jets have a great O line...)
...
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
In my previous post I'd tossed out the thought of trading for a RB on another team.

I just looked at a couple of teams and wondered if any of these might be available for trade...

chicago has Matt Forte and Kevin Jones. Maybe they could be enticed to part with one of those.

Atlanta has Michael Turner as a starter, the backup is Jerious Norwood who looks pretty good.

That's a few potentials without digging very deeply. Any thoughts?
...
written by omar little, February 16, 2010
Kevin Jones is the Deion Branch of running backs. No doubt he is talented, but injuries have ruined his promising career. No way the Bears trade Forte, he is one of the better backs in the NFL and is their only good skill posistion player. We would likely have to give up a second rounder and a later round pick for Forte.
...
written by Jay from NJ, February 16, 2010
Brodie, sorry you didn't like my choice of words by saying "marginally", I'll try to dumb down my comments for you next time. In plain english, Dwyer is not worth the Seahawks pick in the first or second round. Yeah his size is good, what else does he have going for him? He has speed but no acceleration. With the overall speed of the NFL, that will make him average at best. My point is if the Hawks decide to take a RB at the top of the draft, take a gamebreaker. If not, use those picks for the other holes on the team and address the RB issues later in the draft.

So no, I don't think a second round pick who will split carries with Forcett (your words, not mine) with slow acceleration would be "marginally" better than what we already have.
...
written by Spokahawk, February 16, 2010
I have read the last two days worth of right ups about backs and only one second thought about Rankin. He is a play maker and when given the chance last year he had good numbers they just didn't give him a chance. He is 6'1 and 205 with blazing speed. Bates didn't say any names when he said that they have RBs on the team that fit the system, but I tend to think that he meant forsett and rankin. Team those two up with a big back in the later rounds. I also haven't heard any one talk about Stephon Johnson. I heard that he is supposed to be ready to go.
...
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
Spokahawk - I also haven't heard any one talk about Stephon Johnson. I heard that he is supposed to be ready to go.

I brought his name up in a different thread a couple weeks back. I think he has potential. I'm sure PC will have a spot on knowledge on him...so I will trust his judgment on Johnson.
...
written by cts, February 16, 2010
Yeah, I hear you guys on Johnson. I've mentioned him before as well and think he could be a dark horse in the 5th or 6th round. I still think that Scott's acceleration is ideal for a bruiser to compliment Forsett and could be had in the 4th or 5th if that is what we are looking for.
Jay from NJ
written by FWBrodie, February 16, 2010
No need to dumb anything down, just stick to words that you understand. You just used marginally incorrectly again. Not tryig to be a douche, but do yourself a favor and look the word up.

On another note, I don't see where this notion of Dwyer having poor acceleration comes from. He finds his hole and hits it hard. When he gets to the second and third level he runs by people. That's acceleration and that's a "gamebreaker."

Showbiz: I've seen Dwyer "initiate contact" pretty regularly. How did you draw that conclusion?
...
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
RE some people's opinion on Dwyer...some of the terms used to describe Dwyer sound familiar with these...

-------------------

Weaknesses:
Looks overweight - conditioning may be an issue
Just above average speed
No second gear in open field
Shys from contact
Not as powerful a runner as you'd think
Questionable receiver out of backfield
Not a game-breaker in a pro scheme
Unimpressive moves in space to make defenders miss
Doesn't have much elusiveness
Lacks experience in a more conventional running scheme
Highly difficult evaluation

Summary: I want to like Dwyer, but when you combine that he looks out of shape with bad tape, I have a hard time getting behind him. Since early in the season, I have felt he is an overrated prospect. The option scheme limits the evaluation because he is in the three-point stance four yards behind the line of scrimmage (LOS) as opposed to a two-point stance seven yards behind the LOS. I don't see an impressive athlete on tape, but if a team can get him in good condition, he might look like a completely different back in a north-south running scheme.

excerpted from: http://walterfootball.com/scou...jdwyer.php
Seriously Brodie
written by Jay from NJ, February 17, 2010
let it go....I don't understand. Are you his agent? Well, if you are tell him to work on his short shuttle drill. I guarantee it will not be close to the times the top backs in the draft post. Translation- No quickness, no ability to accelerate or change direction suddenly.

Now if I can see that with the limited film available to me via the internet and the college games I watched this season, imagine what the scouts who get paid and have more resources to see more say.

It's not like I'm coming out of nowhere with this stuff, a bunch of people have these same feelings. Some of them are even on here. Bottom line, wait until the combine.

And I know you're not TRYING to be a douche, some people can just do it naturally. smilies/wink.gif
...
written by nadtime, February 17, 2010
In 7 Months you all will be saying I wished we picked Dwyer
ugg boots
written by ugg boots, September 05, 2010
ugg boots
written by ugg boots, September 05, 2010
i like ugg boots
ugg boots
written by ugg boots, September 24, 2010
Nowadays there are a large quantity of people like theboots ofugg ,uggs ,uggs boots andugg footwear is the best of the world,we have all kinds of theboots and women especially.Now we have a good new for you,that is the new style ofwmens boots is coming,it’sUGG & JIMMY CHOO,women with boots is a very good match,you can choose thehigh boot, it can make you look tall,boots on sale now,it includeblack boots and other colors,so our store haveboots for sale now and all issheepskin , and we have thehigh boots of mens boots also,leather boots is the best choice ofboots for mens .If you wantknee boots orwork boots ,you can selectugg 5819 ,women'sclassic cardy , classic cardy ,classic cardy ugg , and allboots for cheap ,if you want short one,you can selectugg 5825 ,ugg australia classic short ,ugg classic short 5825 ,ugg classic short ,and we can provideankle booties , it issnow boots andwinter boots also,if you want a tall boot,theugg classic tall ,ugg classic tall 5815 ,ugg 5815 ,ugg australia classic tall is a nice choice.If you wantboots for men ,wide boots orkids boots ,don’t worry,we can provideugg 1878 ,ugg fringe cardy 1878 ,ugg cardy ,ugg australia 1878 ,ugg fringe cardy ,western boots beside ankle boots andknee high boot , the best isugg 5818 ,ugg australia 5818 ,ugg roxy mid 5818 , and it issuede boots .Theshoes to boots in our store havewide calf boots ,knee high boots andugg bailey button triplet ,ugg baily button 1873 ,ugg australia 1873 ,ugg 1873 .Ourboots shoes ofuggs for sale anduggs on sale now,ugg 5803 ,ugg australia 5803 ,ugg australia bailey button ,ugg bailey button ofboots & shoes is cheap now,and we have all the color ofwomens boot , for example,red boots ,brown boots and so on.If you like crochet,ugg 5833 isugg classic crochet ,ugg australia classic crochet ,ugg 5833 boots havered wing boot andboots for wide calves ,steel toe boot ,ugg 5879 isugg argyle knit ,ugg australia argyle knit ,kneehigh boots ,knee hi boots .Today,theheeled boots is very popular,ugg 5854 is one style ofugg classic mini ,ugg australia classic mimi ,classic mini ugg .In theugg on sale,white boots is the most populargirls boots andhunter boots is personality.Now,I will recommend theugg 5359 ,ugg nightfall 5359 ,ugg australia nightfall ,5359 ugg , it istall boots ,steel boots arethigh boots ,thigh high boot and suitable fortall womens ,thigh highs boots is a nice choose for you ,ugg 5325 ,ugg sundance 5325 ,5325 ugg andugg sundance areboots for ladies ,it’sladies boots ,if you are men ,you can buyrubber boots ,mens sandals . Now,thehigh heel shoes is a nice choose,ugg australia are made of genuine leather.Ourugg boots sale haveugg 5225 , it is one style ofugg ultra short ,ultra short ugg ,uggs outlet haveleather sandals. We are uggs outlet , we have leather sandals,in ourugg outlet ,ugg tall isfashion boots andpink boots is the best choice.If you like sports,mens sneakers is very comfortable.Today , we haveugg boots for sale ,ugg boots on sale ,new boots ,lace up boots have arrived , pleasebuy boots. If you prefer the others, dont worry, we also can offer you, for example,flat boots ,cowgirl boots ,red wings boots ,rocky boots ,thong sandals ,ugg sandals ,sandals ugg ,boot high heels ,over the knee boot andhigh heeled boot ,where to buy shoes , thefashion with boots , our store havepink in boots ,high heel booties , you can buylambskin ,emu boots , ugg classic tall is theclassic boots ,dress boots ,desert boots ,slouch boots ,over the knee boots ,high heel boot ,high heeled boots anddanner boots ,boot on sale now , all sorts of color shoes yan can choose,for example,tan boots ,brown boot ,grey boots.If you come to our store ,you will be a lucky people,because the new style boots has arrived,it includeUGG & JIMMY CHOOKAIA 3041 CHARCOAL ZEBRA ,UGG & JIMMY CHOO 3041 , KAIA 3041 CHARCOAL ZEBRA ,UGG & JIMMY CHOOKAIA 3041 CREAM ZEBRA , KAIA 3041 CREAM ZEBRA ,UGG & JIMMY CHOOKAIA 3047 LEOPARD ,UGG & JIMMY CHOO 3047 , KAIA 3047 LEOPARD ,UGG & JIMMY CHOOMANDAH 3042 Black , MANDAH 3042 Black ,UGG & JIMMY CHOO 3042 . So if you can visit our website, you will have a big harvest,and we are waiting for you!

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy