| 16 February 2010
All week, we’ll be giving a scouting preview of a different running back who are coming out in the upcoming NFL Draft who may or may not fit the zone blocking system. Today, we’ll talk about a guy who may very well be available at the top of the 2nd Round: Jonathan Dwyer
Who is he?

Dwyer is coming out after his Junior season at Georgia Tech; in the last three years, he’s averaged 6.2 yards per carry over 40 games; in his last two years, both as the primary back, he’s averaged 13 touchdowns / season and has had exactly 1,395 yards in both years. From what I’ve seen of him, he lacks lightning acceleration, but once he gets going, he is often gone. He’s the closest thing to a #1 RB in this draft, and has great size at 6’0”, 235 lbs.
How does he fit the scheme?
Dwyer is a tough one to read; on some hands, he looks like a perfect fit: he excels between the tackles, blocks well, has good burst through a hole, and is very decisive. Most importantly: in 3 years, he has never once fumbled the ball, a huge plus for Carroll.
Dwyer has a lot of upside, but it’s hard to read his full skill set coming out of Georgia Tech, which uses a triple-option offense. A lot of the accounts I’ve read indicate that he looks out of shape, a little overweight; he doesn’t run with the punishing style someone of his size should. He has a very funny running style, which isn’t a knock necessarily, just a statement: he looks like he’s moving very slowly, when in fact his insanely long strides are putting him way in front of defenders. That said, he needs to get to open field before he gets in stride, and that just didn’t happen often in college.
Summary
Dwyer is an attractive pick, and his 2nd Round draft stock will be cemented if he weighs in around 220-230 at the Combine, but he is a bit of a risk. I still don’t see the Hawks going with a Running Back quite this early unless they truly believe Dwyer could be an every down back. On paper, he looks like a great pair to Justin Forsett, but as with Spiller, Dwyer doesn’t quite offer what you would think he does. That’s not necessarily a bad thing – both he and Spiller offer some nice surprises, too – but there are more essential holes to fill in the first two rounds, in my opinion.

written by Riggle, February 16, 2010
written by Rob Staton, February 16, 2010
Personally, I wouldn't touch him until rounds 3-4 because there's nothing outstanding to his game. You can find backs like him in any draft.
written by Billy Showbiz, February 16, 2010
written by halkboy15, February 16, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enHecU1i-y8
written by S.TTBM, February 16, 2010
Warren never looked like he was moving fast, but he was! Unlike Dwyer, Warren never shied away from contact--perhaps thats why he burned out in six years or so. That and 300 carries a season will wear anyone out.
My personal preference would be to take Dez Bryant if we take an offensive playmaker--I'd much rather have him than Berry (other coverage safeties with talent like Thomas can be had later) or Spiller.
If the Hawks really want a compelment back to Forsett with some size, it makes no sense to draft Dwyer with his question marks in the second round, when they can get McKnight or Blount or Matthews much later in the draft. And guranteed, if they are looking BPA, there will be lineman and safeties and maybe even a WR or two (Golden Tate?!) likely available at pick 40.
I'd be surprised if they picked Dwyer at 40. Not enough reward for the risk.
written by FWBrodie, February 16, 2010
written by mrcysco, February 16, 2010
written by omar little, February 16, 2010
I do think he played in a ZBS cut and run system at GT, so that alone will make Carroll look long and hard (thats what she said) at him. Personally I don't think he'll fall past San Diego in the first, they need a bigger guy who can carry the load and can afford the risk.
I'd rather sit through another year of Forsett and Jones than take a guy like Dwyer. Not sure how next years class is going to look, but Mark Ingram will probably declare so I'd much rather wait on a chance to draft him.
Of course maybe we can find our guy in the later rounds.
written by Jay from NJ, February 16, 2010
written by FWBrodie, February 16, 2010
Either way, I don't understand how Dwyer wouldn't be a significant upgrade to the roster. Even if you don't consider him an obvious choice to receive the bulk of the carries you cannot deny the complimentary qualities he would provide next to Justin Forsett. I mean the two largest areas of weakness in Forsett's game, game-breaking speed and short-yardage power, are Dwyer's strengths. Julius Jones is marginally stronger than Forsett in those areas at best.
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
That's crazy talk! Sorry, had to say that. Like many, I am not enthusiastic about Dwyer either. I don't want another year of Jones, however. I've written before that I think this is a weak class for RBs (QB's too), but I would like the Hawks to grab one somewhere in the mid rounds...or maybe trade for someone's backup, although I haven't studied to see if there was anyone that'd be attractive.
written by TheRealist, February 16, 2010
But given the size and the production, I am a big fan. He can at least be Shonn Green, dont you think? (i know the jets have a great O line...)
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
I just looked at a couple of teams and wondered if any of these might be available for trade...
chicago has Matt Forte and Kevin Jones. Maybe they could be enticed to part with one of those.
Atlanta has Michael Turner as a starter, the backup is Jerious Norwood who looks pretty good.
That's a few potentials without digging very deeply. Any thoughts?
written by omar little, February 16, 2010
written by Jay from NJ, February 16, 2010
So no, I don't think a second round pick who will split carries with Forcett (your words, not mine) with slow acceleration would be "marginally" better than what we already have.
written by Spokahawk, February 16, 2010
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
I brought his name up in a different thread a couple weeks back. I think he has potential. I'm sure PC will have a spot on knowledge on him...so I will trust his judgment on Johnson.
written by cts, February 16, 2010
written by FWBrodie, February 16, 2010
On another note, I don't see where this notion of Dwyer having poor acceleration comes from. He finds his hole and hits it hard. When he gets to the second and third level he runs by people. That's acceleration and that's a "gamebreaker."
Showbiz: I've seen Dwyer "initiate contact" pretty regularly. How did you draw that conclusion?
written by Highlander, February 16, 2010
-------------------
Weaknesses:
Looks overweight - conditioning may be an issue
Just above average speed
No second gear in open field
Shys from contact
Not as powerful a runner as you'd think
Questionable receiver out of backfield
Not a game-breaker in a pro scheme
Unimpressive moves in space to make defenders miss
Doesn't have much elusiveness
Lacks experience in a more conventional running scheme
Highly difficult evaluation
Summary: I want to like Dwyer, but when you combine that he looks out of shape with bad tape, I have a hard time getting behind him. Since early in the season, I have felt he is an overrated prospect. The option scheme limits the evaluation because he is in the three-point stance four yards behind the line of scrimmage (LOS) as opposed to a two-point stance seven yards behind the LOS. I don't see an impressive athlete on tape, but if a team can get him in good condition, he might look like a completely different back in a north-south running scheme.
excerpted from: http://walterfootball.com/scou...jdwyer.php
written by Jay from NJ, February 17, 2010
Now if I can see that with the limited film available to me via the internet and the college games I watched this season, imagine what the scouts who get paid and have more resources to see more say.
It's not like I'm coming out of nowhere with this stuff, a bunch of people have these same feelings. Some of them are even on here. Bottom line, wait until the combine.
And I know you're not TRYING to be a douche, some people can just do it naturally.
written by nadtime, February 17, 2010
written by ugg boots, September 24, 2010
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



