| 01 February 2010
Ladies and gentlemen, the draft season is officially upon us. Last week was the Senior Bowl, the Combine is mere weeks away, and over the next few months, you'll be hearing more about prospects and drafting philosophies than we'll care to remember come May. To kick off the draft season, Daniel Jeremiah from Move The Sticks was kind enough to donate some of his time for an interview. For those unfamiliar with the site, it's worth a frequent read and his Twitter account @movethesticks is easily in my top 5.
Jeremiah worked in the NFL for six years as a scout, with the bulk of his time spent with the Ravens and the balance with the Browns. Without further ado, let's get this thing off the ground:
Seahawk Addicts: How did you first get involved in scouting?
Daniel Jeremiah: I worked for ESPN Sunday Night Football for 2 years following my graduation from Appalachian State. While in Baltimore for a Ravens game, I bumped into my brother's college roommate. He was an area scout for the Ravens and he introduced me to the Ravens Director of Player Personnel Phil Savage. I told Phil that I was interested in scouting and he recommended that I volunteer at the scouting combine in Indianapolis. I flew to Indy and helped the Ravens scouting department corral players for interviews, stocked their meeting room with food and saved seats at the morning weigh-ins.
I interviewed for a full-time scouting job the following spring and was fortunate enough to get the job. I always advise those that are seeking employment in the NFL to offer their services free of charge for a trial period. This is a great way to demonstrate your commitment and passion to the profession.
SA: Is there a single position that is particularly difficult to assess?
DJ: For a myriad of factors, QB's are very difficult to evaluate at the college level. Another position that is tough to assess is the WR position. With the proliferation of the spread offense, a lot of these college WR's aren't asked to run NFL routes and rarely see press coverage. You can watch 3-4 games on a prospect and not see one single rep of him dropping his weight and working back to the QB. That is where the importance of the individual spring workouts comes into play. You get a chance to see them run every route on the route tree.
SA: What is your favorite position to scout, and why?
DJ: As a former college QB (albeit an average one) I have always enjoyed grading Offensive Lineman. I really believe you determine your team's attitude and style by what you do at those five spots on the OL. In Baltimore, we felt that our team had lost a little bit of our physical nature on offense.

In one draft, we chose Ben Grubbs and Marshall Yanda. We began to build a bully. Since that draft they have added Michael Oher and signed Matt Birk as a FA. They are a physical, punch you in the mouth style of football team not just because of their vaunted defense but because of the makeup of their OL. If you look at most of the struggling teams in the NFL, almost all of them have issues that need to be addressed in their OL.
SA: How much of a collaboration was there from your studying and school visits up to the draft room?
DJ: We had the same philosophy and system in place in both Baltimore and Cleveland. Each scout is assigned an area of the country to cover. We had cross-checker scouts (national scouts or college director) that also made a fall visit to study every draftable prospect. In the last week of November, we would send a third scout to visit the players that we had major interest in. After the college season was over, each scout was assigned a position to evaluate. During meetings, we would spend time going over each player. All of the fall reports would be read, all-star game evaluations and combine results would then be discussed. Then the scout that interviewed the player would discuss what he had gleaned from the conversation.
After all of the information was discussed, our GM would then ask the scouts to compare the player we just went over to other players at his position. Once we found a landing spot for him at his position, we compared him to players across the board that were given a similar grade. Eventually, we entered the draft with our list of 150 players in order. From there, it is pretty much paint by the numbers. We would just check off the names one by one until it was our turn to pick.
SA: The Seahawks have recently moved to a zone blocking system. What do you look for in a zone blocking lineman, and does the importance of the left tackle change much?
DJ: In a zone blocking scheme, you are looking for more agile lineman. You sacrifice a little bit of size for athletic ability. The importance of the Left Tackle doesn't change because it is still your QB's blindside in pass protection. The challenge for scouting O-lineman in this system is finding Guards that are agile enough to work laterally in the run game and stout enough to anchor vs power in pass protection.
SA: How important is the Combine as far as assessing the players? For example, is a 4.4 40-yard dash really that much faster than a 4.5 for, say, a CB?
DJ: Play-speed is always more important than timed speed. If you see a CB get beat vertically several times on tape and he runs a 4.55, it is affirmation that his lack of deep speed is a major concern. If you see a WR consistently get separation out of his break and show a 2nd gear when the ball is in the air on vertical routes, you don't concern yourself if he runs a 4.55. Hope this makes sense. In other words, two players could run the same time and cement the fact that one is fast enough while the other isn't.
SA: What is the single most important characteristic of a college player to successfully transition to the NFL?
DJ: Phil Savage did a study of this question when he was in Baltimore. He came up with 3 things: Speed, Toughness and Instincts. Every report that scouts in Baltimore write, they have to mention and give a grade to each prospect in these 3 areas. If a prospect is fast, tough and football smart, his odds of succeeding at the next level are extremely high. If he has 2 of the 3, he still has a fighting chance. If he has 1 of the 3, the odds are stacked against him. If he is void of all 3 aspects, there is a Zero percent chance he makes it. Of those 3, speed proved to be the most important factor.
After studying the players that flamed out over a 10 year period of time, lack of game speed was the number one issue. Most of the best teams in football are fast. This is true at every level from Pee-wee, High School, College and the NFL.
SA: Last year, the Seahawks drafted Aaron Curry who was hyped as being the most explosive, pro-ready LB in a decade. Instead, Curry had a decent year while a number of LBs taken after him had great rookie efforts. Do you see Curry eventually fulfilling that hype, and what do you think his biggest strengths are?
DJ: I really believe Curry will be an outstanding NFL Sam Linebacker. He is physical as a point of attack run defender and excels in pass coverage. He will need time to develop as a pass rusher. He was much better as a blitzer than as a pure pass rusher coming out of Wake Forest. With coaching, you will see him improve in this area. After visiting the school and studying Aaron, I came away most impressed with his leadership ability. This will show itself as he gets more experience. It is way too early to have any regrets with this selection. He will work his butt off to get better and this draft will provide the Seahawks a chance to get him some help on that side of the ball.
SA: The Seahawks have half a dozen needs (DE, S, RB, QB, OT, CB at a minimum). The first round will be mocked to death by April, but who are some guys who have caught your eye in the last year that might fit those needs?
DJ: In watching several Seattle games this year, the thing that jumped out at me was a lack of explosive playmakers on both sides of the ball. One of those first 3 picks needs to be made on a player that can generate big plays on offense. I love CJ Spiller from Clemson and Dez Bryant from Oklahoma State. The off field issues with Bryant are based on a little bit of immaturity. He isn't a bad kid.

I really like Russell Okung, the OT from Oklahoma State. He would fill a huge need for the Seahawks but I have a feeling he won't be around by the time their first pick comes up. If Sam Bradford's shoulder passes all the tests, I would pull the trigger on him with the Hawks first pick. He is one of the most accurate passers to come out in the last 5 years. He would fit beautifully in this division.
SA: Finally, what (or who) do you think your biggest success as a scout was, and/or biggest disappointment?
DJ: As the West Area Scout for the Ravens, I was able to help sell Haloti Ngata to the group. I won't count that one, it wasn't a difficult sell job! A couple of year's ago, I would've answered that question with Derek Anderson. I knew he was a wild card type player but I was able to sell him to Ozzie in Baltimore. We chose him in the 6th round and he made it to a pro bowl a few years later in Cleveland. Obviously, he has since regressed terribly but to have a QB go to the pro bowl after getting picked in the 6th round was a pretty cool thing for a 2nd year area scout. I feel really good about Ahtyba Rubin. I was only in Cleveland for one draft but we hit on this 6th round pick. He should be a solid starter for a long time.
My biggest disappointment would also come from that one year in Cleveland. We picked Beau Bell in the 4th round. He was good on tape. There were 30 NFL LB coaches at his pro day at UNLV. He had a horrible workout that day. He was bothered by a knee injury that had dogged him since the Sr Bowl. We took him with the hope that we would be getting the player we watched on tape. That player never reappeared and he was out of the league one year later. Lesson learned.
=======================
Hopefully you all enjoyed Daniel's input as much as I did. I want to thank him for giving his time to our humble little blog, and again stress you should check out his site and his Twitter account.
Image sources: 1) Baltimore Sun; 2) Photo by Scott Boehm/Getty Images North America; 3) Photo by G. Newman Lowrance/Getty Images North America

written by Irish4life, February 02, 2010
written by GnarlyHawks, February 02, 2010
written by Riggle, February 02, 2010
written by JJs, February 02, 2010
Thank you.
written by seahawk, February 02, 2010
written by omar little, February 02, 2010
I'm glad he pointed out how some players have game speed. I pointed this out the other day with Forsett. He only runs a 4.6 (I think) but he appears much faster on TV. I also pointed out that this is what made Jerry Rice and Steve Largent stars, they only ran like 4.5 speed but always seemed to be open 25 plus yards down the field, and once the ball was in their hands they were always a threat to take it to the house.
I also like accleration in players, especially WRs. Look at TO, I don't think any player in the past 10 years had a better 0 to 60 time than TO, and that is what helped make him a success. He would stop on a route, then next thing you know he had 2 or 3 yards on the corner deep down the field.
Dez Bryant seems to have this speed also (timed in 4.5 range), so to me he would be a viable option at 14. His suspension does not bother me, as it was more of a technicality than actual behavior issues.
written by Farmer Paul, February 02, 2010
written by CanadaHawk, February 02, 2010
My question is this: If we pick big playmakers with picks 6 and 14 and disregard the OL, wouldn't we be in the same boat this time next year? Hass has no time to throw and we keep getting stuffed (and if we keep this up, we won't even have Matt). Besides, don't we already have playmakers like TJ and Nate? So isn't this draft supposed to be about getting better upfront first?
written by Billy Showbiz, February 02, 2010
written by Recordblender, February 02, 2010
written by tam, February 02, 2010
written by cts, February 02, 2010
Yes, OL is a major priority but you can't reach for one. In my opinion, Okung and maybe Campbell are the only options at #6. I don't like Williams or Davis as a fit for our ZBS. At #14, I only think Campbell, Bulaga and maybe Brown/Iupati depending on the combine. Even they Brown/Iupati are a bit of a reach.
So yes, OL is a major issue, but you can't reach. That is when these play makers like Berry, Haden, Spiller come into play. I don't agree with Bryant at all as WR is one of our last needs on the team and WR has probably the highest bust potential of all positions.
As for Gibbs, the guy already had talent on his lines going into the jobs. He basically refined their skills and only had to fill gaps. He also had MUCH healthier players. It's not the same here. Our OL is tattered, broken and he is having to completely rebuild it. We are in rebuild mode and expect to see at least one OL taken on day 1 of the draft this year and the next at a minimum. He's a great coach, don't get me wrong, but our OL isn't Cinderella and he isn't the fairy godmother.
I expect to see an OL close to our 2005 OL or close to through him but it won't be next year (or even 2), but in the future. And we have to add some top end talent to get Gibbs to a situation where he can fill gaps with raw players to coach up and refine their skills. Guys like Capers fit this mold. Big, athletic, strong enough, but raw in technique. It's guys like Oher who have everything physically going for them, but raw on the technique that Gibbs would drool over.
written by cts, February 02, 2010
I've been watching highlights of these guys and I stand by my statement that Blount is the only one playing faster than he times. However, I will say that Scott is the fastest to the hole. If he had that second gear and wasn't always being chased down I'd be all for him.
I was watching Best, Spiller and Dwyer too. These are the 3 I'd consider taking on day one. Matthews seems slow to me. Definately slower than Dwyer on the field. Dwyer looks really good at #40. Spiller is on another level as I've said and everytime I think about taking someone else at #14 I watch his highlights and I get sucked right back in. Best is good and fast, but Spiller has that special something.
Spiller has such good speed, agility, vision and awareness. He constantly is making people miss and that is just something Best just doesn't bring to the table. It's easy to see why everyone is comparing him to Chris Johnson. If he's there at #14 we'd be stupid to pass on him.
Comparing videos between Best and Spiller I often saw Best's big runs coming from huge holes and straight line speed. Spiller makes plays out of nothing and has such good vision to bust a big play. Just watch the video below and tell me he's not worth that #14. Don't know why I keep being open to someone else at #14 when I can't stop being in complete awe of this guy.
or this link http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wf0kC-w9lU http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wf0kC-w9lU
written by BoiseHawk, February 02, 2010
written by BoiseHawk, February 02, 2010
written by JohnnyB, February 02, 2010
written by S.TTBM, February 03, 2010
Years ago when I was writing for an online music magazine, I interviewed an up-and-coming local band whose music I loved. Long story short, it was MUCH more difficult to come up with good questions than to write criticism! It was excruciatingly difficult, in fact. So my hat's off to you for your excellent interview.
If I ever win the lottery and start a paper/magazine, youre hired!
On the old chicken/egg argument: O-line or playmakers first:
I think the Hawks line wont be fixed completely in one year. Nor will all our playmakers be found in one draft/free agency period. The challenge of our new coaching staff is to plan over the next 2-5 years which impending free agents they intend to target and when, and which college players they like--at least in the first three rounds a year.
I dont see us fixing our line immediately in the draft. I think it will be a mix of FA and the draft over three years that will get us where we want to be. Meanwhile, it might be prudent to take a playmaker or two high in each draft.
It still comes down to BPA. If they think CJ SPiller, for instance, is a once-in-a long time type of player at a need position, they may choose to snag him rather than a LT at 6--especially if the LT who grades out there (Okung) doesnt fit what they are looking for as well as Spiller. They might also decide that next years RB/WR Class is better, and next years LG class poorer, and pass on Byrant to take a LG this year (iupati anyone).
As long as they seem to be finding the BPA at each pick, I wont get too upset with whomever they pick.
And while our line is in shambles, so are parts of our RB and WR corps, our secondary, and our D-line. Cant fix them all in one season. So rather than pick 3 O-lineman in one draft, hoping to solidify it in one fell swoop, I think the prudent thing is to try to build a complete team over say, a three year period. This would entail NOT concentrating on one unit, but carefully picking the BPA at need positions.
But if we choose a playmaker or two or three on offense or defense, we can continue to tinker with the lines to find the right combo to compelement our playmakers over the next couple seasons.
What I would advocate is taking one lineman high--if theres a guy available at the slot who is the BPA, while also bringing in at least one if not two competent NFL starters in FA. We build in one offseason a competent line that is a mix of aging vets and young up and comers. Over the next three years we draft the replacements for the vets and build a long-term stout young line.
Meanwhile, we take playmakers where they grade out, and sprinkle them in along with the lineman. We have an aged WR corps full of overpaid underperforming vets that needs overhauled SOON. Drafting one WR in the top three rounds over the next two-three years should fix that problem.
The running game needs a short-yardage bruiser (who knows if Schmitt can be that guy or not) and a solid counterpart to Forsett. Perhaps Rankin is that guy, but a McKNight/Blount type back wouldnt go amiss in the right draft spot.
We also have D-line issues, and the secondary is missing at least one if not two pieces. Trufant is aging, and we all are hoping he isnt facing a Shawn Springs-like injury related droppoff.
So there are obviously more holes that draft picks even over the next two years. However, we still should be able to field a contender next year, or the year after at the latest, if Caroll and company are all theyre cracked up to be.
As long as the top three picks this year give us two starters and a good backup/role player, Im gonna be happy.
Even if we dont get Tate/Bryant/McKnight/Thomas/Brown or any of the other guys I kinda covet.
written by cts, February 03, 2010
Everything I say is relative. Relative to who's available when we pick. I'm not saying reaching for Brown at #14 if Bulaga and Campbell are off the board. Like I have said over and over, I want a Berry, Spiller 1, 2 punch. Then an OT at #40, then a mid round if someone like Fox, Veldheer or Wang is available and/or an OG. We will be getting a few comp picks this year (anyone have any idea of how many?) and using 2-3 picks on OL doesn't neglect the other positions. We need health on our OL. But yes, this is all with respect to what we do in FA as well.
written by S.TTBM, February 03, 2010
One of the big issues I had with Ruskell was he would rather draft a mediocre potential player from a big school than pick a star from a smaller school. I dont think thats the right way, but neither am I advocating the Holmgren approach: reaching for small school guys just because--that didnt work too well either. YOu have to be prudent.
But I hope Caroll at least takes a good look at some of the guys that were men among boys, at least in later rounds.
written by omar little, February 03, 2010
Drafting from big name schools has got us players like Kelly Jennings and Baraka Atkins. We have to take some chances and maybe we'll get our own Ray Rice, Rasheen Mathis, or whoever.
written by cts, February 03, 2010
I'm just not an advocate of taking smaller school guys higher in the draft. Most small school players are in the mold of Michael Roos. This is why I have concerns with Iupati at #14. The level of competition just isn't there.
written by omar little, February 03, 2010
written by cts, February 03, 2010
Either way you look at it, Wake Forest isn't a small school. They are just not traditionally a top end football school. Not to mention they've been a Bowl team 3 out of the last 4 years and one of them being a BCS game.
written by MrMali, February 03, 2010
written by cts, February 03, 2010
As for Forsett, he's not the miracle man. I love the guy, but he is too slow and way too small. We haven't seen if he can even carry the load as a true starter. He's not a franchise back, but would make due.
written by Highlander, February 03, 2010
As for Forsett's speed...he plays faster than he times. I think he could carry the load of the team of he had a strong compliment to back him up. What I mean is 20 to 25 carries...probably never going to be the 35 plus carry type guy.
written by MrMali, February 04, 2010
written by cts, February 04, 2010
Because you are speaking of the Alexander after he got injured and lost it mentally. Before 2006, Alexander ran hard too. They were both starters for the same amount of time with the Hawks and Alexander put up 3000 more yards and 40 more TD's than Warner and that is with Alexander's 3 years of injuries/soft play. Give SA those 3 years healthy and he may still be running the ball for us.
So yeah, I stand by my statement that Alexander is better than Warner. You are just associating SA with the negative way he ended. Did you watch them play? You may have a bias towards Warner but don't throw out accusations without knowing what you are talking about. And if he was as unimpressive as you say he was, then why was he voted to the all decade team?
written by MrMali, February 04, 2010
I do not care about most stats btw. I care about what I see in a RB. Warner suffered a torn ACL his 2nd season in the 1st game and was never the same but still a very good RB and played 6 seasons vs SA's 8 seasons. SA played only 2 not 3 seasons after his one "great" Super Bowl year. He never had the special ability to regularly make the 1st tackler miss which is what the great RBs do IMHO and to gain an extra 2 yards at the end of the run like Forsett does. Also, just for info there are very few RBs who can carry the ball 25-30 times a game anymore. I like Forsett to carry the ball 15-18 per game and J. Jones who ran good this last seaosn to form a viable 1-2 punch. Forsett is also a very good blocker unlike SA. I just prefer we use the selection on a different position rather than RB is all. I respect your opinion and yes as a 43 year old former RB I saw them both play. Total yards for a RB is like talking about RBIs in baseball meaning they are based upon other variables like opportunity. Yards per carry has a meaning but total yards not so much especially when comparing an average team to a team who is a contender year in and year out with 3 Pro-Bowl lineman. Again, I meant no disrespect as I like and appreciate most all the comments I have seen from you. It is refreshing to discuss football with someone who has a clue.
written by cts, February 04, 2010
I agree with the poor pass blocking and receiving. These are areas that Forsett brings something to the table that SA didn't, but Forsett just isn't fast enough to be a featured back. Plain and simple. I do agree he plays faster than he is timed, but he doesn't separate in the open field. That lack of 2nd gear bothers me.
Either this year or the next we have to draft a RB for the future that can be a franchise back. Forsett isn't going to scare anyone in my opinion. He's slow and like 5'8" or 5'9". That to me is not really someone you have to gameplan around. That's why I'm a big advocate of Spiller. He doesn't really have any weaknesses. He's fast to begin with, but looks faster on film, he's a good blocker, receiver, returner, hard runner, hits the hole hard, but is also patient, he's agile, has great vision/awareness, is a team player/leader and is a threat every time he touches the ball. Despite what many have been saying, he took ~20 carries/game (minus 4 games where he took less than 10 due to inferior teams). He could easily be a 25-30 carries/game back. He's a rare talent and we are in a unique position this year to get him. I think QB is in the same position, but I'm not sold on this years early round talents.
Not to mention Spiller did it through playing with injuries. He did all of this through a minor knee sprain and turf toe. As a RB you can attest to how much turf toe can affect your running yet he was still amazing and it didn't really affect his cutting that much. Imagine if he was healthy.
That's besides the point. I agree Warner is great. Don't get me wrong, he isn't in the HOF for nothing and I was too young to really remember him the first half of his career so I will give you that. I don't really remember him before his injury.
written by cts, February 04, 2010
I still don't like Tate or Gerhart. I think Blount is a hard runner and plays faster than he times and has the most potential, although not huge, to be a franchise back and could supplement Forsett well. However, I think Scott would be the best option of these four. After going back and watching him, he has a very quick first step and hits the hole fast and hard. That is exactly what you should look for in a bruiser complement back and if we were to pass on a franchise type back I'd be on that bandwagon in the 4th with either Scott or Blount, in that order.
written by cts, February 04, 2010
written by MrMali, February 04, 2010
Most players know that quickness which is hard to measure, is much more important than top end speed. Barry Sanders was not fast, but quick as a cat and I consider him one of the top 3 to ever play the game. Largent was not fast but had quick feet and he is considered one of the best to play the game. Forsett has that rare ability to make the 1st tackler miss which is something SA did not do. How often does a RB use their 40 speed in a season? Maybe 2-5 times? A 4.3 40 time for a RB looks pretty but does not do much. However, quickness is used every time a RB touches the ball. I love to watch Forsett run as he just gets it. I love how he fights, twists, ducks and dives to get 2 or 3 extra yards at the end of a run when SA would have fallen backwards or danced and lost 2 yards. 25-30 carries a game in the NFL = a very short career. Teams are shying away from the workhorse RB for several reasons.
There are RBs who put up big numbers with great lines like Franco Harris, Emmitt Smith and Shaun Alexander. None of those were a 4.3 threat to go all the way but were very consistent in what they did. I am not a huge fan of any of those 3 but I respect them. My favorites include B. Sanders, G. Sayers, E. Campbell, J.Brown and Sweetness. A few like Billy Sims and Bo Jackson had short careers. I could talk RBs forever -lol. I am excited to see how things will play out for the team- GO HAWKS!
written by MrMali, February 04, 2010
written by Highlander, February 04, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...e=related
written by S.TTBM, February 04, 2010
ALexander was a great back for six seasons, and he was not 4.5 fast either. He could still get away from defenders. And so can Forsett.
FOrsett runs like Walter Payton--but his small stature means he takes more of a beating and has to expend more energy than a guy Alexander's size. Which means you dont want to see Forsett carrying the ball 20-25 times a game, plus catching passes and pass blocking. 10-15 carries a week, with the occasional 20-carry game would be perfect. He showed he can handle that, especially if we fix the O-line.
WHile a guy like Spiller would be great, I dont think he's a must have--because Forsett can be a star too. He's a potential 1500 combined rushing and recieving type player. And Rankin may turn out to be a great counter-punch to Forsett--who's to know? I sure liked what I saw from him when he was on the Raiders in preseason.
If we draft an RB this year or next, I think it should be an all-purpose or a bigger back. Someone with size and decent if not world-class speed.
As for the O-line now getting all the credit for Alexander's stats, thats ridiculous. Its just been too damn long since we all watched Shaun rip it up week after week. People forget. While the NFL and plenty of other people never embraced Alexander due to his wierd personality and his penchant for avoiding the hit whenver possible (which was taught to him by Stump Mitchell by the way), ALexander was a HOF type player for six years. And that line was only truly great for one season--the other five seasons it was merely ok to pretty good.
Its all the rage to discount all those yards and TD's, but I remember watching him make something out of nothing, and I remember too that even after his injury he would run damn hard whenever Holmgren asked him to. Remember the GB game in the snow where his foot was still injured? 40 carries (a Hawk record even Warner never topped) despite his obvious lack of agility. Then a few weeks later, against the best rush defense in the NFL, SD, he rushed for two TD's (one long run so pretty I almost cried) and 138 yards. All of those yards came hard. Its the best game I have ever seen by a running back--and I go back to Payton's last couple seasons.
Shaun lost his agility and a little speed in the offseason after his injury, and he was no longer quick enough to run the same way and make it work. He could have turned himself into a straight-ahead bruiser like Eddie George at the end of his career, but obviously he wimped out (and chose to walk at 55) and decided not to bother.
You know, when he was tearing up defenses weekly, not many fans cared if he ran out of bounds rather than get an extra yard on a 30-yard run. Why? Because we knew he was gonna get in the end zone in another play or two anyway.
written by MrMali, February 04, 2010
written by cts, February 04, 2010
A versitile, bruising back like Dwyer would be good for this team. I've been an advocate of him, but if the value is right and he's the BPA at #14 why pass on Spiller. In my opinion, he is leaps and bounds better than any other RB in this draft and Forsett.
I love Berry, or Haden for that matter, at #6. We need a playmaker on D and I really only see those 2 being that player at #6 unless McCoy were to somehow fall and even then I'm not too sure I take him over Berry. I don't like any of the DE's there and no way Suh falls.
I agree about the whole OL thing. People need to stop believing Gibbs is a miracle worker. He had good healthy lines in place when he started and just made them better. Yeah he didn't get high OL draft picks, but only because he just needed to patch holes and could afford to pick "his player" later in the draft. We are in rebuild mode, not refine mode and that will take high picks the next couple years. It's just ignorance to think we can spend our midrounders to fix our OL and turn it into the Dever type of OL. Not an option.
One thing we can all agree on is that Forsett is light and day compared to Jones. I don't think Carroll will make the same mistakes Mora did in regards to those two. Slave, I totally agree with you about Alexander.
written by MrMali, February 04, 2010
written by cts, February 04, 2010
I disagree with Walt. If he passes through our Docs I'd give him a better shot. Him at 80% is above average in the NFL and better than anything else we have on our team. We need all the help we can get on the OL. I say play him until someone takes his job. I don't think that's how it will happen, he's more than likely done, but I have my fingers crossed.
written by MrMali, February 05, 2010
CTS I agree with almost everything you have said previously. S.A we can agree to disagree but, risking a season on Walts health is not a wise gamble to take. If you do that and Walt again misses the year then you have 2010 all over again. Are you saying you would be ok to have Locklear as our LT and Willis as our RT again in 2011 and hopeneither get injured?
written by cts, February 05, 2010
written by MrMali, February 06, 2010
written by cts, February 06, 2010
I'm just saying that with the injuries our OL has had the last couple years more is better and especially with LT. We've had nothing but RT's trying to play one of the hardest positions in football. Not acceptable.
Who's to say that a restructuring of his contract isn't an option either. We could use the senior leadership too. I'd be on your side if this wasn't an uncapped year.
written by nike air max 2009, April 25, 2010
womens air max 2010
womens air max 2012
written by nike air max 90, April 25, 2010
written by BerylVaughn, June 24, 2010
written by mens timberland boots, July 25, 2010
written by ugg boots outlet, August 16, 2010
written by ugg boots, August 25, 2010
vibramis the world leader in high performance rubber soles, targeted to the outdoor, work, recreation, fashion, repair and orthopedic markets.five fingers is the featured product of their. vibram five fingers are very famous all over of the worldfive fingers vibramvibram fivevibram five fingers sale,there are several kinds:vibram five fingers classicvibram five fingers flowvibram five fingers kso,if you want to buy cheap vibram five fingersvibram five fingers surgevibram five fingers kso blackbuy vibram five fingersvibram five fingers discountvibram five fingers sizevibram five fingers reviewsvibram five fingers shoesvibram five fingers shoethe vibram five fingersvibram five fingers ebayvibram five fingers womennew vibram five fingersvibram five finger runningvibram five fingers hikingvibram five fingers Bikilavibram five fingers Performavibram five fingers Performa JaneVibram Five Fingers Sprint you can go to vibram5fs.com
I want to buyboots shoes,my friends told me aboutugg boots,they saiduggs are very good,and the real brand isugg australia boots fromugg australia andugg uk.winter boots andfur boots are very popolar in winter,especiallyugg sale,ugg boots saleugg boots uk.and theclassic tall is the classic style.ugg boots cheapsheepskin shoesuggs saleuggs ukboots footwearceltic sheepskinlove from australiasheepskin bootslippers bootsclassic tall chestnutugg australia salesheep skin bootsugg boatsceltic sheepskin companysheepskin footwearugg australia onlineaustralia classic tallwomen's classic cardygenuine uggboots There are several stylesugg 5815ugg 5825ugg 5803ugg 5819ugg 5833ugg 5879ugg 5854ugg 5359ugg 5325ugg 5225
There are many brands ofboots shoes,likeugg bootsuggsugg australia boots,ugg australiaugg uk. They are all winter boots and fur boots.ugg saleugg boots saleugg boots ukclassic tallugg boots cheapsheepskin shoesuggs saleuggs ukboots footwearceltic sheepskinlove from australiasheepskin bootslippers bootsclassic tall chestnutugg discountugg australia saleugg boots discountsheep skin bootsugg boatsceltic sheepskin companysheepskin footwearugg australia onlineaustralia classic tallwomen's classic cardy and thegenuine uggboots have this styles:ugg 5815ugg 5825ugg 5803ugg 5819ugg 5833ugg 5879ugg 5854ugg 5359ugg 5325ugg 5225
written by pandora jewelry, August 25, 2010
written by Nike Dunk, September 02, 2010
written by handbags wholesale, September 19, 2010
written by pandora-bracelets-sale, September 27, 2010
written by cheap handbags wholesale, September 28, 2010
As we all kown,shopping is a favorite sport for women.So,Replica Louis Vuitton Bags , we cann not ignored it. This cheap designer handbags, showed its elegant temperament and subtle, simplicity and no not complexity. Louis Vuitton Bags, hats and capsmuch more valuable than those thing who buy on impulse and single good that so-called popular but no practical. And in my website,yourbestdesigner.com. Replica Louis Vuitton Purses, cheap handbags wholesale, you have multiplechoice as your please. What about Wholesale Handbags, it really should buy for the cost-effective.
written by sale ugg boots, October 12, 2010
written by cheap ugg boots, October 22, 2010
UGG 30th Anniversary ugg Bailey Button Triplet UGG Classic Crochet Short UGG Classic Short Romantic Flower UGG Classic Tall Baroque UGG Dakota UGG Roxy Tall ugg Short Paisley UGG Special Style UGG Sunburst Tall ugg Tall Patent Paisley ugg Ultimate Bind UGG Ultimate Cuff UGG Upside UGG Whitley ugg women elsey ugg Womens Broome ugg-Bailey Button ugg Tall Stripe Cable Knit ugg-womens corinth ugg-Classic Tall ugg-Classic Cardy ugg-Classic Short ugg-Ultra Short ugg-Ultra Tall ugg-Sundance II ugg-Argyle Knit ugg-Classic Mini ugg-Nightfall ugg Infant Erin ugg-New Edition Metallic
written by UGG Boots Shoes Sale, October 24, 2010
written by moncler, November 09, 2010
written by ugg sale, November 09, 2010
written by North Face UK, November 18, 2010
written by Microsoft Office 2010, November 18, 2010
written by SFP, November 23, 2010
written by formal dresses, November 29, 2010
written by ugg boots, December 02, 2010
written by Canada Goose Jackets, December 08, 2010
written by pandora bracelets, December 15, 2010
written by cheap laptop battery, December 28, 2010
written by mens north face jackets, January 07, 2011
written by cheap nfl jersey, April 03, 2011
written by Lacoste Protect Laser, April 11, 2011
written by ghd flat irons, April 12, 2011
ghd classic styler certainly understand what he says the reunion was meant to follow the mini ghd suzerain away ah! even he does not understand why the mini ghd suzerain made a big temper , why suddenly regret , But he can be sure GHD MK4 Black, suzerain of the magic of being inspired by, certainly
written by GHD MK4 IV Gold, April 12, 2011
Great to be dynasty.
Martial arts can be said in the past few months deserted them, and panic.
Because the first martial arts people , best in the world Villa suzerain ghd cheap, which I do not know what causes a few months he possessed as a general killing.
Has been weak , he deserted , in the past has been a matter of martial arts involved and ignored ghd straightener, I do not know when, I do not know what for , since the martial arts began in the tube thing.
He took people off with the shovel Longxiao Villa and his personal grudge of some individuals , large and small sects , and merged them.
He then topple former martial against some of his jurisdiction .
When he brought people to help Sichuan to find the devil ’s lair GHD IV Salon Styler, people only really see the ghd cheap how much the forces , previously known for his powerful Dragon sword , a
written by karen millen dresses, April 12, 2011
2011 Spring Newest Karen Millen Sporty Cotton Fabric Blocking Dresses
Authentic Karen Millen Flowers sexy red and white dresses
Karen Millen Inclined brought turbidity color spell dresses
Cheap Christian Louboutin Cathay Peep Toe Calf Leahter Wooden Platform Slingbacks Pink
Karen Millen Silk embroidered pencil dresses with top quality
Hot Sale Christian Louboutin Madame Butterfly Black Pumps 150mm
Karen Millen Lace Dress Black with contrast nude lining and signature stretch satin contrast panels and gathered neckline
Christian louboutin Decocolico Mary Jane 125MM Classic Suede Platform Pumps Red Brown
2011 Hot Design Christian Louboutin Leopard Grain Pumps
Discount Christian louboutin Walibou 75MM Mary Janes Black Patent Platform Shoes
Karen Millen Signature Print Dresses Blue with peplum skirt detail
Karen Millen Satin Dress Black For 2011 fashion styles
On sale Karen Millen White and Red Flower Dresses
Karen Millen short pink Strapless Dresses For 2011 Spring Design
Authentic Discount Karen Millen Double Layers Neckline Buckle Belt Tailored Cotton Shift Coats Yellow Hot Sale
Authentic Karen Millen Outwear Camel Cape Short Coats JK025
Christian Louboutin Loubout 120 Open Toe Gold Button Suede Platform Ankle Boots Black
Christian Louboutin Rosella Ballerinas Watersnake With Bow Ballet Flats Nude
Christian Louboutin Staratata 140MM Strappy Multicolored Suede Platform Sandals Pink
written by gucci wallet, May 16, 2011
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



