| 29 November 2009
Apologies for the delay on posting this, was at the in-laws mowing down some turkey.
Pro Football Weekly is reporting that Tim Ruskell has been informed that he will not be re-signed as GM and President of Football Operations of your Seattle Seahawks. This melds with earlier reports that no talks had yet been carried out between him and the organization. From the article:
Inside sources have told PFW that beleaguered Seahawks GM Tim Ruskell, who is in the final year of his contract, has been told that he will not be re-signed after this season. With Ruskell now reportedly splitting the scene at season’s end, the door appears to have opened for Mike Holmgren to return to the Seahawks as the head of football operations.
I know a lot of you hate Ruskell, and I have recently moved to the side that says he should not be back, but it is kind of a sad day. Experiment Ruskell has, indeed, failed (if the report is to be believed). I do think that Tim Ruskell has brought in a boatload of talent to this team, and if he does not return, the future performance of this defense will have a lot to do with him for at least two to four years. Once the move is official and a successor is named, we'll obviously start breaking down likely moves. In the meantime, who do you want to see at the Helm?

written by MonroeCoug, November 29, 2009
written by jeff bernard, November 29, 2009
written by Mark Johnston, November 29, 2009
If he goes, I say David Gettleman.
written by Kathy Holmgren, November 29, 2009
Kathy Holmgren
written by Riggle, November 29, 2009
Coach? That's a tough one. There's is no one who excites me. Maybe Leslie Frazier from Minnesota?
written by B., November 29, 2009
written by T.J., November 29, 2009
I am confident that there will be an extensive search and that the best person will be hired. If that turns out to be Holmgren, I'll be fine with that. Once upon a time Bill Belicick was considered a failure, given a second chance, and was able to redeem himself his second go-around. If the only choices are TR or MH, I'll take MH, despite his earlier mistakes. I believe that he is still one of the best minds in football and believe that he has had time to reflect on his past GM mistakes. I also think that if he can be a full-time GM, with no coaching demands, he will do better. It doesn't hurt that he learned from Bill Walsh and Ron Wolf. If someone else is given the job, I will be confident that Paul Allen and his advisors have done their due diligence and will hire the best person for the job - maybe it will be someone that Paul Allen is able to pry away from a perennial contender with an offer he can't refuse.
One thing for certain, if TR is gone, I will feel better about having multiple first round picks during a draft when the offensive side of the ball has so many needs. The thought of TR drafting a QB-of-the-future or offensive lineman scares the crap out of me.
written by Farmer Paul, November 29, 2009
written by TheRealist, November 29, 2009
I dont know if holmgren is the guy or not, but I'd like to see who some good candidates would be from the top tier teams around the league, like the Colts, Steelers and Pats.
written by omar little, November 29, 2009
I'd rather have Ruskell and his guys handle this draft since hes been scouting these players for YEARS. I don't think Ruskell is just going to turn over all his notes to his replacment.
Remember Ruskell's first draft where he only had a month or two to prepare? Thank God for Spencer, Tatupu and Hill because everyone else in that draft class is out of the league.
written by omar little, November 29, 2009
I think the right way to judge a GM is to look at the 2-7 round picks, where GMs don't buy into the hype of a player and you can really assess that GMs skill. I mean anyone with half a brain can name what players will go in the top 10 it gets harder later in the draft.
written by T.J., November 29, 2009
written by omar little, November 29, 2009
written by Recordblender, November 29, 2009
Holmgren built the core of the dominant super bowl team of 2005 by drafting RB Shaun Alexander (00), WR Darryl Jackson (00), LG Steve Hutchinson (01), DT Rocky Bernard (02), TE Jeremy Stevens (02) and CB Ken Lucas (01), among other great draft selections.
Holmgren gave up the Seahawks first round pick (10th overall) and a third round pick to Green Bay in exchange for the Packers first round pick (17th overall) and QB Matt Hasselbeck.
And that isn't including his free agent aquisitions. This is a no brainer!
written by bobbyk, November 29, 2009
written by Oregon Hawk, November 29, 2009
written by tlingithawk, November 29, 2009
written by Hawkdude, November 29, 2009
Though I do want to see changes, I doubt that TR is gone. I think we have to deal with him and Mora for at least another year.
Not to spoil anyone's day, but this article is not conclusive.
written by CWEH, November 29, 2009
P.S - My condolence to the family of the 4 fallen hero's in Lakewood! I hope the bastared gets the death penalty!
written by Richard, November 30, 2009
written by endureguy, November 30, 2009
So, if Holmgren is not interested then curious as to who will end up being our GM if these Ruskell rumors are true. Who is out there?? Another total rookie GM? I don't know if we can handle another rookie..granted we do not have a Hutch type transaction if the offing this off season but trusting a very important draft to a total rook would be risky.
written by S.TTBM, November 30, 2009
And yes, I would love to have Holmgren back. His mistakes were drafting a couple thugs (Stevens,etc), reaching, and penny-pinching Philip Daniels/Sam Adams, and dumping quiet Jay Bellamy. Its pretty obvious he wont repeat those mistakes, and he seems much more able to admit fualt and change course now.
Holmy the GM wasnt great, but he wasnt terrible. As for his supposed failure to draft defense, he drafted a couple CB's who were far better than anyone Ruskell brought in--Lucas and Trufant. Both were Pro Bowlers. He also drafted Tubbs, whose knee injuries werent forseeable. Tubbs was the most dominant run stuffer in the NFL for a year and a half, and wasnt bad at rushing the passer either.
Holmgren was pretty good in free agency too. Overall, I think he was at least Ruskells equal. Especially conidering the results: Ruskells teams havent done as well, and winning is everything.
To be honest, I have mixed feelings. I certainly wont be cheering Ruskells departure, I really wanted him to succeed here. But enough is enough, and its time. Before we drop off the NFL map altogether.
And if anyone suggests we hire that idiot Cowturd one more time, I swear Im gonna puke! 1) He wasnt that good a coach 2) His own players were glad when he retired 3) His brand of football would require a complete teardown of this team 4) Super Bowl 40--remember?! Dude KNEW the refs would slant the game his way, and he accepted that. The man is no sportsman, and I hate him. Never in Seattle!
written by iz, November 30, 2009
written by Texashawk, November 30, 2009
written by hawksfan80, November 30, 2009
written by Frozen Hawk, November 30, 2009
written by rossco17, November 30, 2009
written by Steve S., November 30, 2009
I haven't really thought about Ruskell and don't intend to until the
season is over, but I do have some things to say about replacing him
with Holmgren.
1. Holmgren is 61 years old and has already quit once due to burnout.
2. In his first try at GMing he showed no knack for choosing
defensive personnel.
3. Holmgren took his sweet time "rebuilding" the Seahawks the first
time around. He didn't even bring in his preferred quarterback until
year three. What I'm driving at is, like Ruskell Holmgren tried to
piecemeal his team together rather than "rebuild" it. How long will
it take to remake this team as Holmgren's, and will he survive another
round of burnout by the time that happens?
I like Holmgren and am grateful for all he did for the Seahawks, but
if it's time for a new direction at GM then maybe it's time for just
that, a NEW direction.
written by Steve S., November 30, 2009
Curry is of course talented but is only a rookie and is playing like one. Kerney and Grant used to be talented but their best days are behind them. Trufant is talented but has been terrible since coming off the PUP list. Hill, Tatupu, Hawthorne, and Mebane all have positive attributes but have always been quite overrated by Seahawks fans. The rest are run-of-the-mill to bad. In other words, while you might have been able to say the defense was talented two years ago, I don't see how that's the case now.
written by Papahawk, November 30, 2009
Undoubtedly, if Holmy came in as GM, he would end up becoming coach, a la Pat Riley. This could work out. But also, burnout would concern me. Mike is no longer a young man.
Whoever mentioned Leslie Frazier as a defensive "genious" and a good fit to be our HC. I'll only take that guy if he comes with the Williams Wall and Jared Allen. When you have that much talent on the d-line, its easy to look good as a coordinator.
Whoever is the GM needs to get the Hawks to be strong on both lines of scrimmage. The best teams have a strong presence on the line, both sides. The Hawks have some good young players there, but they are not great by any means.
written by 2010Hawks, November 30, 2009
written by Billy Showbiz, November 30, 2009
As for GM it's tough to say because I don't really know who is qualified for this job. Holmgren, Shanahan, Cowher, who else? These guys are coaches so I don't know if any of them is qualified to handle the business end of the team. As for evaluating talent, I think any of these guys would be good in a Parcells like role. If that is not possible Holmgren may just be the guy. If he were there I'd love to see Gruden come in as coach or OC. I don't trust Gruden on his own but under Holmgren as GM I think he'd be a great coach.
written by bw, November 30, 2009
Holmgren is not the answer. I love him, hope he does well wherever he goes but he is a big part of our struggles now. He was playing to win at the time regardless of our future (now). Refused to play or develop young talent and ignored the defense. I mean, his practices literally were offensive practices until they got it right and our defenses played like it.
In a gm you want somebody looking to the future and the present. Somebody willing and able to draft/find in free agency need and to develop for the future. Holmgren has ALWAYS brought in his guys. And that means, all the retreads will be getting priority over possibly more talented youth.
Anyone else appreciate how good Forsett is playing now? Would've been nice to seem him get any reps once the season was over last year but no, Holmgren used Morris and Duckett almost exclusively. Neither who is around, nor frankly, should be. Holmgren was insistent on trying to squeeze out any wins from his veterans, not for the fans, but for his own record and for his veterans to make their bonuses.
Holmgren needs to seriously rethink some of his strategies, because what worked so well for him, or reasonably well, (he only has one sb ring not the greatest coach ever as many people describe him as) has been largely neutralized.
I'm not even sure that Ruskell WILL be gone after this year. Possibly, but this is all unsubstantiated rumor at this point. Possibly, but I'd prefer him to stay or for them to get somebody new. BUT NOT HOLMGREN.
Love Ya Holmy, you were great for us and a huge figure in Seattle sports. You moved on and we need to as well. Good luck!
written by omar little, November 30, 2009
written by Farmer Paul, November 30, 2009
Sources: Seattle Seahawks Fire Tim Ruskell
Jesse Cahill by
According to Pro Football Weekly sources familiar with the situation have said Tim Ruskell will not be re-signed as Seattle Seahawks General Manager when his five-year contract runs out at seasons end.
Since inheriting a loaded roster in 2005 and spicing up the defense with then rookie LB's Lofa Tatupu, Leroy Hill, and Free Agents DE Bryce Fisher, CB Andre Dyson, and WR Joe Jurevicius, the Seahawks have been in a steady decline.
Ruskell has missed on many of his first-round picks: C Chris Spencer is a total bust, and seeing All-Pro G Logan Mankins plucked five picks after at No. 32 by the Patriots makes it sting even more.
Cornerback Kelly Jennings has been a total bust. Without the injury-riddled roster the Seahawks have endured, Jennings would have been nothing more then a dime back this season.
In four years the Seahawks have gotten an average of 36 tackles, eight pass deflections, and one total Interception from Jennings.
It hurts to see a guy like Marcus McNeil, an All Pro Tackle, grabbed all the way down at No. 50 by the Chargers. It's not like the need was not there for an offensive lineman, they chose to ignore the need, and we have seen the end result of that negligence with the team posting their two worst rushing outputs in franchise history. In fact since drafting Chris Spencer, the highest picked lineman in the draft has been fourth-rounder Ray Willis, currently a backup.
Third time's a charm, because in his third draft with the team Ruskell made one of the franchises worst moves in trading a first-round pick (later used on current starting Patriots S Brandon Meriweather) to acquire wide reciever Deion Branch.
This trade led to the departure of Pro Bowl QB Matt Hasselbeck's favorite target, WR Darrell Jackson. The Seahawks essentially traded their best WR at the time and a first round pick for now third WR Deion Branch and now reserve G Mansfield Wrotto.
They have also coughed up an average of $6.5 every season for Branch to average 40 catches, 509 yards, and four TD's a season, pathetic for the amount of money he is making.
Even the high-profile pick of Linebacker Aaron Curry, considered to be the draft's top prospect, has had a shaky start, averaging only five tackles a game even with his expanded role when both Leroy Hill and Lofa Tatupu were sidelined.
The trade of Julian Peterson to Detroit was awful, as Cory Redding has been a total bust even in a rotational role. He is sadly not even on pace to surpass his pathetic 2.3 career sack average. I get why the Seahawks traded Peterson, but couldn't they have gotten back something better?
Overall, since Ruskell inherited the team in 2005, the records have declined from 13-3, to 9-7, up to 10-6, then hitting rock bottom at 4-12, and currently sitting at 4-7.
Some will say you can't point the finger at Ruskell for the Seahawks horrible injury plague the last two seasons. Keep in mind he is the one who assembled the roster, so that makes him directly responsible, no matter what angle you try and take.
He is also the man responsible for running MVP Running Back Shaun Alexander out of town. People say he was washed up, but from what I remember he was superior to his eventual replacement Julius Jones in his last two years here playing with a broken foot.
Shaun Alexander 2006-2007
20 games 1,616 yards, 3.55 average, 12 TD's
Julius Jones 2008-2009
24 games 1,090 yards, 4.0 average, four TD's
And don't even get me started on Poison Pill Hutchinson. Not only did Ruskell botch that, but he has failed to draft an adequate replacement, and he signed a washed up Mike Wahle to try and cover his huge blunder. Since the Vikings pounced on the chance to sign football's best guard, the Seahawks have never been the same.
Bottom line, Ruskell made some good moves, grabbing Lofa Tatupu, Leroy Hill, Julian Peterson, Brandon Mebane, Josh Wilson, Patrick Kerney, but the roster he has assembled over his five years here has largely crumbled and failed.
Contrast this to Mike Holmgren, who laid the foundation for the 2005 Super Bowl team with key starters QB Matt Haselbeck, RB Shaun Alexander, G Steve Hutchinson, WR Darrell Jackson, C Robbie Tobeck, T Sean Locklear, S Ken Hamlin, DT Rocky Bernard, and DE Grant Wistrom. It is safe to say that Holmgren's moves turned out better in the end and that Ruskell has wrecked the loaded roster Mike Holmgren left him.
The news Ruskell is likely out as GM at season's end would not surprise many Seahawks fans, and the replacement already resides in Seattle and needs a job.
Make the transition seamless: fire Ruskell, hire Holmgren, and let's get back to perennial playoff status.
written by Hawksmack, November 30, 2009
written by LouieLouie, November 30, 2009
written by LouieLouie, November 30, 2009
written by ugg kensingtonAdministrator, December 15, 2010
there are all kinds of UGG shoes ,I am sure that you will find the boots you love:
I am sure that you will find the boots you love:
ugg roxy tall boots,
ugg boots,
classic ugg boots,
cheap ugg boots,
ugg sundance ii boots
ugg ultra short boots,
bailey button ugg boots,
ugg shoes,
ugg shop online,
ugg kensington,
womens ugg boots,
cheap ugg boot sale,
ugg broome leather,
UGG Classic Tall,
ugg snow boots,
ugg roxy tall,
Hot sale products:
UGG 5124 Women's Suburb Crochet Chestnut
UGG Jimmy Choo Sora Boots 3045 Chocolate
UGG Classic Tall 5815 Chestnut
Jimmy Choo UGG Starlit Boots 3044 Chestnut
Our product list is as follows:
UGG Ultimate Bind Boots
UGG Stripes Classic Tall Boots
UGG Argyle Knit Boots
UGG Nightfall Boots
UGG Lo Pro Classic Tall Boots
UGG Classic Tall Boots
UGG Classic Tall Boots NEW
UGG Classic Mini Boots
UGG Ultra Tall Boots
UGG Classic Crochet Boots
Ugg Kensington Boots
UGG Half Waterproofing Boots
UGG Women's Bailey Button Boots
UGG Roxy Tall Boots
Tall UGG Boots
UGG Tassel Short Boots NEW
Short UGG Boots
UGG Classic Short Boots
UGG Ultra Short Boots
UGG Classic Cardy Boots
UGG Lo Pro Button Boots
UGG Women Highkoo Boots
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|



