logo
Here's the results of the 10th week of the Bold Prediction contest with Seattle At St. Louis.

Here's the data from the game:

 

Team Sacks - 4
Rushing Yards - 170 - RondoinSTL (163)
Passing Yards - 95 - Louis Phan (209)
Most Tackles - Babineaux - Hawks Fan (Babs)
Most Receptions - Burleson
QB rating - 65.8 - kelphelper (83)
Most Sacks - Redding, Hawthorne, Hill, Kerney
Takeaway/Giveaway - +1
Sacks Allowed - 1
Defensive Yards Allowed - 364 - Louis Phan (351)
Exactly Matched The Predicted Value
Closest To A Predicted Value

Contest leader: wagnerseth (25 points)

Runners Up: kelphelper, Pacificsands (23 points)

To see the current standings, please press "Read more" below. 

Here's the current standings.

Contestant                                  Points

 

wagnerseth 25
kelphelper 23
Pacificsands 23
BillT 22
blazedonkey 22
HawXLIV 22
seahawkfankk 21
Louis Phan 20
Ocho 20
Trademark 20
galitsky 19
SEAHAWKS4LIFE 19
Hawks Fan 18
diehard82 17
PT Hawk Fan 17
Scotia Seahawk 17
Seatownfan12 17
TacomaHawk 17
thedeathstar 17
bobofoosh 16
Don Millard 16
Tampa Hawk 16
#11 15
Dog Chow 15
double_s77 15
Eric Kuehlthau 15
Hawkdude 15
Papahawk 15
sushiseattle 15
The Daybreakers 15
USAFANARC 15
ZakH 15
12thmanDan 14
Alberta Hawk 14
Bong Smoking MANIAC 14
Fugaz 14
jmedic 14
mek 13
roby 13
RondoinSTL 13
The Nameless 13
CarolinaKB 12
DC hawk fan 12
doubleb 12
Icehawk 12
Jeit3 12
Halkboy14 11
Ian Barrett 11
chawk 10
Marco Polo 10
MANUNITED23 9
Phil N dBlanc 8
texashawk 8
1bobr51 6
CWEH 5

Hasta,

BillT

Comments (4)Add Comment
...
written by Louis Phan, November 30, 2009
Just wondering, but since kelphelper's entry was after midnight Pacific time, does his entries still count? Because i have a strategy such as in QB rating...if you have noticed i have been the last person to put my entry most of the weeks, so that i can get the least or highest value. For example, my QB rating was at the time the lowest, and i thought that it would be the last entry of the day (since it was), so that is why everything under 85.0 would have been correct, so yeah it just feels kinda weird that i planned to be the last entry so that my strategy would work, yet someone enters later and puts in a QB rating of 2 less than me, and ends up getting the point when if he had not then i would have gotten it
...
written by BillT, November 30, 2009
Louis,

Since I didn't specify that it was 12 midnight Pacific Time, I decided to take his entry because 12 midnight in Seattle is 11 pm in Alaska where he resides. If I accepted his entry, I figured I had to accept them all (there were four of them) since I'm sure they were all in before game time (I saw them all there before th4e game started).

I plan to put out the message in next weeks contest announcement that the midnight deadline is midnight in the Pacific Time Zone and I will no longer make such adjustments. I was unaware of the time discrepancy until now so in fairness, I never set up the deadline to be time zone specific just that it had to be by Saturday midnight. I won't accept them again late like that since fair warning will have been given.
...
written by Louis Phan, November 30, 2009
oh ok...

dang...i was so close to getting that QB rating thing then lol.

maybe you should give us both points? lol just kidding
...
written by kelphelper, December 01, 2009
louis phan: i have utilized a similar strategy in the past and been burned the same way. i wasn't trying to "poach" the qb rating however. i was gone the whole day helping out a friend and was lucky to get home before midnight and post an entry at all. i rushed through it and blind guessed everything. i had no idea i had the lowest qb rating and was surprised to get the point.

i hope that alleviates any thoughts of dishonest intent on my part. i will be getting my entry in much sooner from now on.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy