logo

When I think about the Seahawks’ 2008 season, the first word that comes to mind is something I’m not allowed to print here.

2008 was the year that injuries plagued a freakishly high number of players; mainly those in the receiving corps. Nate Burleson, Logan Payne and Ben Obomanu were all lost by Week 2 with season-ending injuries, while other offensive pillars like Deion Branch and Bobby Engram missed time with various ailments themselves. Soon after this, Seattle fans started hearing names like Billy McMullen, Michael Bumpus and Keary Colbert in the starting lineup at receiver.

It seemed like the team just couldn’t catch a break; and the remaining receivers couldn’t catch anything in general.

But 2009 is a new era, and the battle for who gets the starting nod at receiver begins a week from today at training camp.

Currently, the Seahawks have 11 receivers on the roster: Deion Branch, Michael Bumpus, Nate Burleson, Deon Butler, Mike Hass, TJ Houshmandzadeh, Jordan Kent, Billy McMullen, Ben Obomanu, Logan Payne and Courtney Taylor. Of those, Housh is the expected starter in the slot, Burleson at split end, and Branch at flanker. Those jobs are basically theirs to lose, and in all likelihood, these names won’t change. That means the remaining eight guys are looking at a fierce battle for a roster spot come August... click "read more" to continue.


On the bubble:

Butler – He could be looking at punt return duty, given his 40 time was closer to a cheetah’s than to a human being. Personally, I’m also interested in seeing how he handles regular WR duties. I’m not sure he’s physical enough to be a slot receiver, given that his size isn’t ideal for the role, but he could see time in situational plays or three-wide sets. (I’m not betting that we’ll see many four-wide sets with Knapp running the show.)

Obomanu – Before breaking his collarbone early last year, Obo showed promising glimpses. He has good instincts, decent hands and can stretch the field in sort of a Deion Branch-without-the-bum-knee kind of way. The remaining question will be whether he can bounce back from the injury (like Branch and many other receivers) and show he can be consistent.

Hass – The buzz has been hot on the former Oregon State product’s showing in OTAs. Still, he’s a relative unknown when it comes to being in the pros, and nobody outside of Renton has any idea what he is or is not capable of. I’ll be watching him closely during training camp on Aug. 8. The word on the street is Hass has great hands and solid athleticism, and if that all translates to the NFL, we could be looking at another diamond in the rough.

Likely headed to the practice squad:

Bumpus – He was called into action on the active roster when Wide Receiver Meltdown 2008 occurred. He played in four games, accumulating 48 yards and a touchdown. While Bumpus has some fundamentals in place, I think the team is going to want to shelve him on the practice squad for another year before he’s ready to make the transition. Besides, his one touchdown was against the Rams, and I think even Sullivan could’ve scored on them last year. [Sullivan's note: There's a reason Parker is known universally as "Pu**yhands Parker" on the football field. Lets not throw darts when lord knows we couldn't catch one in return...]

Payne – It seemed like a year ago at this time, Payne was poised to become the next Joe Jurevicius. I think I even said the same thing at some point last August, when everyone was riding the “It’s Holmgren’s last year, we’ve gotta be great!” bandwagon. Well, much like the season’s imminent collapse, Payne went down with a torn ACL in Week 2. Still, Payne earned the nickname “Human Vacuum” in camp, and I heard it wasn’t because he sucked. He’ll have to vacuum up every pass thrown to him in camp (and then some) to earn a spot on the roster, but it doesn’t look good. He’ll likely either be cut or relegated to the practice squad if he isn’t 110%.

Don’t let the door hit you on the way out:

Taylor – When called upon to help salvage a dismal-looking receiving corps last year, Taylor was ousted in mediocrity only by Keary Colbert, who is now playing in NFL purgatory. (And I mean the Lions, not the Raiders.) Taylor routinely dropped passes and showed very little hustle when needed, and he will likely be outplayed by most everyone on the roster. Sorry, Courtney, but it appears your time is up.

McMullen – Also brought in to revitalize the receiving corps in Week 2, which was also the game in which he fumbled and lost a pass at the 49ers 2-yard line. Arguably, that would’ve won the game for the team, allowing a 1-1 start. This is not to say the loss or the season was McMullen’s fault, of course, but it was plays like that that make him expendable. Perhaps he’s improved, and perhaps he’s eager to redeem himself, but it’ll be a long road. Plus, he’s ineligible for the practice squad due to prior experience with the Eagles and Vikings.

Kent -- Great speed from this 2007 draft pick, but his ball skills appear to be the problem. I think he could be used as a punt or kick returner if Butler wasn’t around, but it looks like Butler trumps Kent in the pass-catching AND speed departments. Of course, that has yet to be confirmed, so there’s no use jumping to conclusions. But from what we’ve heard, Butler is the real deal and the team believes very strongly in his ability to contribute immediately. This all could be very bad news for Kent, who would need to earn a roster spot this year to save his status with the Seahawks.

Comments (22)Add Comment
...
written by halkboy14, July 27, 2009
Its too bad Jordan Kent is as good as i thought he would be.
He has the size of a great WR and speed.
...
written by Seth H., July 27, 2009
I like Bumpus, and when I heard we got him I was excited, thinking he could replace Engram in the slot someday.

I also find it difficult to think Butler is on the bubble. Did you see what we traded for him? We need him to come in and play and be our big play threat.

From what I've heard of Hass, he's slow. 4.7, but he won the best receiver award, so he may be a dark horse to make the 53 man. I can't wait for the preseason games!
...
written by BillT, July 27, 2009
If we're going to keep 6 receivers which has pretty much been the standard for a number of years now, I think you have to conclude that Butler will earn one of the remaining three spots and that leaves two remaining spots up for grabs between Michael Bumpus, Mike Hass, Jordan Kent, Billy McMullen, Ben Obomanu, Logan Payne and Courtney Taylor. If your supposition is correct that Bumpus and Payne can be shelved on the practice squad (I'm not so sure about Payne) and Taylor will be released (I concur with that assumption), that leaves Hass, Kent, McMullen, and Obomanu to be the real challengers for the final two positions. All of them are PS ineligible and therefore going to make the team or be released. I'd like to see Payne and Bumpus on the PS as in season replacements if necessary but doesn't Payne have too many games or whatever to be PS eligible? Anyone?

I've heard good things about Hass (good hands), MuMullen (runs good routes and catches everything thrown to him), and Obomanu (knows all three WR positions and has the talent to play at any one of them) coming from the OTA's. I've not heard much about Kent, Payne, or Bumpus.

Everything usually changes when training camp starts and they put on the pads. Names you didn't hear from the OTA's all of a sudden are prominently mentioned and guys who were said to be having a great offseason dissapear when the hitting begins and the real football starts. Playing in shorts and not being able to hit can give a false impression of a players impact. When a player can follow through on his moves, lots of guys who didn't impress in the touch football phase show up big on the radar. Conversely, looking good in shorts doesn't always translate to looking good in pads when you have to actually make the play rather than show you were in position to make the play. Training camp definately is where they separate the men from the boys.

4 more days till the team reports. I'm stoked!
...
written by Seahawk Addicts, July 27, 2009
Bill, Payne only has three games under his belt. I had to check, I assumed more. We talk about him on here like he's a seasoned vet, but he... isn't.

If I were a betting man, the WR depth chart would look like this:

1. Houshmandzadeh
2. Burleson
3. Branch
4. Butler
5. Payne
6. Obamanu

We like Bumpus because he's a local product, and he's, y'know, okay and stuff, but him, Kent, Taylor, et al may not be long for this league. Payne looks more like the long-term slot guy to me, with Obo playing pretty much every position. IRing him last year was one of the biggest mistakes we made (in hindsight). He would've been back by week 6-7 and we could have really evaluated him. Instead, we got Keary Colbert and Courtney Taylor.
...
written by Jeff M., July 28, 2009
I agree with the analysis of the 3-WR lineup (Branch at Flanker, Burleson at Split End, Housh in Slot), but in our 2-WR sets (where Housh is probably playing Flanker), is Burleson the starting Split End or Branch? I think Nate fits better there, which also makes me think Branch is making a little too much money for a sub-package player. Couldn't we get something from Baltimore for him and let Butler or Obomanu be the third WR (I'm assuming we want to have Carlson on the field all the time and a fullback most of the time anyhow)?
Bumpus is the MAN!!
written by STTBM, July 28, 2009
Bumpus looked so good last year, Holmgren almost made him a starter. True, he struggled along with the other young guys when all the vets went down, but he looked good. In my mind, he has a legitimate threat to make the team.

Parker--Dude, werent you one of the ones insisting that Julius Jones 2 lonely 100 yard rushing games last season were harbingers of his awesomeness, despite the fact that they came against the two worst defenses in the NFL against the run?!! And now you are saying that Michael Bumpus' TD against the Rams is tainted because they suck??! One way or the other, Man!! If Jones gets any credit for those games, then show Bumpus some respect too!

Obomanu isnt fast enough to be a starting WR in the NFL. And he drops passes. Hass has a better shot due to his sneakiness and unreal hands. McMullen did catch 5 passes for 70+ yards in the Niners game--the one where he fumbled. He does have promise, and he's huge. Kent is not going to make it. He needs two more years as a practice squad/garbage time player, and we dont have the WR corps to indulge that luxury. Look for the Broncos to pick him up, as they were after him last year.

Courtney Taylor reminds me a lot of Nate Burleson: Loads of talent, never delivers, isnt consistent, does make the occasional great play. Taylor made a couple fantastic catches from Wallace late in the year. And one thing to remember is that Holmgrens conservative play calling may have hampered the young WR's as much as thier inexperience last year. Taylor has too much talent not to have a shot at the team.

Payne is just Odd Man Out. He tore his knee, and he wasnt fast to start with. While I think he would have made a fine slot reciever before the injury, I think Hass beats him out. Hass doesnt have a bum knee.

I think Seattle may keep 7 WR's this year, and I sure would. Housh, Butler, Burleson, and Branch, followed by Hass, Obo, and Taylor. I think Bumpus has a good shot at making the team, but Seattle may try to keep him off the field in Preseason games in order to stash him on the Practice Squad. I think Payne has to beat out Bumpus and Hass, Taylor and Kent are fighting for one spot, and McMuffin and Obo are fighting each other. You have to look at what skill sets each player brings.

Either way, Seattle can no longer afford to keep guys like Kent, Payne, Hass, McMuffin, and Obo around hoping "someday" they learn to play.

I sure hope they figure out that the same applies to the offensive line....
...
written by STTBM, July 28, 2009
damn, the last line should read "offensive line"...
...
written by Seahawk Addicts, July 28, 2009
STTBM - you're dead on, I think. The Hawks can't keep waiting for young players to catch up with the team. If Kent, Payne, Taylor, and Obamanu can't absolutely seize a roster spot in the preseason, than they don't deserve a spot. I love the seventh-round success story as much as the next guy, but not at the expense of my Hawks.

I think McMullen is in the first cut of players, honestly. While I'd like to see Bumpus stick around, I don't really see it happening. I do believe him and Payne are still PS eligible though.
...
written by Gonzo, July 28, 2009
STTBM - I'm not disrespecting Bumpus; what I was saying is that I think he might need more development before they turn him loose on the 53-man roster. And for the record, who knew Julius would be all but yanked off the field by Holmgren every week after 3 games? I hope he gives us something to cheer about this year, and I hope Bumpus lives up to his potential, because he has PLENTY of it.
Does Zorn want any
written by Oregon Hawk, July 28, 2009
Do you think Zorn would want any of our cast offs? What about any preseason trades?
...
written by IdahoSeahawksFan, July 28, 2009
SA... Can you guys take off the dang banner at the top of the page? The one that comes down at the top wanting you to click on it every time you go to a website? It's quite annoying. I don't mind an advertisement in the sides but at the top every single time is not good. There is also this internet explore error that pops up on every page as well. Thanks
...
written by Tom Powell, July 28, 2009
So here we find our selves talking about the depth of Wide outs for the SeaHawks. I think all of us really care about this issue based on last years horrible season. I would like to ask the question, "Are our WR's good enough as a whole." I guess the reason that I throw this question out there based on the fact that I really would not be scared of our WR line up. There isn't any one there that is a game changer. All of them have reasons as to why I feel the way that I do. TJ has never been the lead dog, he has always had Ocho teamed with him. Branch hasn't been fully healthy in years, and Brully is comming off of a Boo boo. Not to mention the fact that he has never lived up to the expectations we all had for him coming in from the vikings. Should this be a source of concern for the Hawks? or should we be more concerned on Depth? Can we achieve balance within our desires (Depth vs. Quality) Just some thoughts for discussion I thought I would throw out there for discussion.
...
written by HawkDE, July 28, 2009
yes, if possible it would be nice to remove that "season in the balance" banner the moving video is really distracting when I'm trying to read my SA!!
Agreed
written by Hawk Bait, July 28, 2009
1. Houshmandzadeh
2. Burleson
3. Branch
4. Butler
5. Payne
6. Obamanu

I think this is a legit 6 right here. I loved what I saw from Payne and I would be upset to see him back on the PS. He could be another Wes Welker... and not just bc he's white, for all you smart-asses out there haha

I was stoked on Bumpus, but I didn't see much that set him aside from those 6 up there. And Kent is such an incredible athlete... but what do you do with that one?? Maybe it could be argued that he and Obamanu are interchangeable...

Either way, our top 3 are quite the dynamic. I am just PRAYING that they can all stay healthy, though. Fingers crossed...
PS Fantasy Implications
written by Hawk Bait, July 28, 2009
Can I also throw out a suggestion?? That nobody on this site add any Seahawks to their fantasy teams? Obviously, if none of us pick them up, the less likely it is that the powers-that-be strike them down with injuries or poor numbers... Your thoughts? smilies/wink.gif
...
written by JayHawk, July 28, 2009
It's all about Hass
...
written by a guest, July 28, 2009
:evil:
hawksFan4every
written by Hawkseye, July 29, 2009
1. Houshmandzadeh
2. Burleson
3. Branch
4. Butler
5. Hass
6. McMullen

I love Hass. I just have a feeling if he is given a chance he could be one of our best wr. McMullen is big, tall and strong and can catch the ball. He does not break down in game conditions like most of the other pretenders we have been trying to groom. Butler will be a player to watch. I hope he can play with the big boys.
I love this site
written by Hawkseye, July 29, 2009
I love this site. Keep up the good work
...
written by kelphelper, July 31, 2009
the key that everyone is missing here is that most of our guys are coming off of injuries. many receivers are not the same after a torn acl, or at least take a year to get back to 100%.

there's no way to tell how the line up will shape up, until they battle. even nate and branch are serious question marks at this point.

and i'm sorry to say it, but some of them will get dinged up in pre-season as well.

so i'm glad we have a big pile. i have liked what i've seen from bumpus and payne and think they have a legitimate shot. mcmullen and obumanu haven't shown me too much, but i hope and pray that courtney really is gone.

i'm so glad the season is almost here..
...
written by uggs outlet stores, November 10, 2010
This is such a great resource you are providing. uggs outlet|I enjoy seeing sites that understand the value of providing a prime resource for free.cheap uggs| I really loved reading your post. Thanks! uggs outlet|
Good Post !
written by chi straightener, December 19, 2010
Good Post! Your post is an excellent example of why I keep comming back to read your excellent quality content that is forever updated. More please, this post helped me consider a few more things, keep up the good work.I will keep your article in my chi straightener.

Write comment
You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy